Category Archives: Religion & Spirituality

The Best of Future Conscience 2009 – 2012

Augmented Reality concept (image by Electric Images, Flickr, CC)

Rose and Calla lily (image by CresySusy, Flickr, CC)It’s quite strange to think that Future Conscience has now been running for three years. Over 150,000 words through almost 200 posts, there’s a lot here that visitors to the site just won’t come across unless it happens to be through a specific search term. To recognise three years of writing the blog I thought I would highlight some of my favourite posts, the ones that I would hope everybody who visits would read (and share!) and that highlight the tone and purpose of the blog the best.

I’ve left out some of the most recent ones, which are easily found, and also those in the most popular posts list to the right (that Top 10 Futurist Films post has seen so many views I can’t see anything toppling it). Some posts that I’d like to include here I haven’t to keep the length manageable, so there’s still some hidden gems for you to find if you hunt through the archives (or the random links that pop up on the sidebar).

If there’s only one post that you share with your friends and followers – please do make it this one. Celebrate our third anniversary and help spread the word with these: the best of Future Conscience 2009 – 2012!

Society 3.0 – Where all of us have a voice (2009)

One of the first posts on the blog.  The early posts show a far less nuanced writing style, and I think also are a bit too full of naivety. But with this one I think the groundwork was laid for what the blog was to become. Starting originally as a daily blog highlighting futurist news with an ethical slant, it was here that I started to show the social commentary and personal philosophy that would become the norm. For that reason alone it’s an important one to have on this list…even if I cringe every time I read posts from around this time.

Augmented Reality: The Good, the Bad, and the Ugly (2009/10)

Augmented Reality concept (image by Electric Images, Flickr, CC)I like this series of posts because it takes a look at one particular technology – augmented reality – and approaches it from multiple angles. All technology can be used in both positive and negative ways, and you should really do a post like this for every futurist projection. It’s also a post that I neglected to conclude for quite some time, so the final part shows quite a different writing style to the earlier two.

Ethical Blogging Series (2009)

One of the early topics covered was this ongoing series of posts on ethical blogging. What does it mean, how can you do it, why would you want to? Blogging is one of those mediums where people don’t really consider much how to respect intellectual property, their readership and the ethics of monetisation, and the role that a good ethical foundation can play not only in the topics that you write about but in the practical structure of the blog and how it’s put together.

Tweetivism: Social Justice or Internet Lynch Mob? (2009)

Continuing with the themes of social commentary and longer posts, I’m quite proud of this post because it highlights an issue which has become increasingly important in the years following. It’s nice to feel somewhat ahead of the curve, and it wasn’t until a year or so later that editorials started cropping up regularly in the mainstream media on this very topic.  By the way – how ugly are Google Ads? Bleh…glad I stopped using those.

[Review] Radio Free Albemuth: Into the Mind of Philip K Dick (2010)

Radio Free Albemuth: Interview with Writer/Director John Alan Simon (2012)

Philip K DickIf I had to choose a favourite post, most of the time I’m going to choose my initial review of Radio Free Albemuth. Primarily because of the absolutely surreal experience that I had on the day (given in full detail in the post), but also because it opened up a dialogue with the film’s director and producer which a year later meant that I was able to meet them in person to discuss the movie and also score an interview for the blog. Being such a huge fan of Philip K Dick, I felt priviliged and honoured to be part of the roll-out of this film in whatever small way. Here’s hoping it gets a wider release very soon!

The Rabbi & The Golem: A Parable of Synthetic Life (2010)

Musings Along the Way: 40 Spiritual Aphorisms (2010)

Why We Should Not Worship God (2011)

The parable is the only piece of fiction on the blog, I really enjoyed writing it and I do feel it’s important for people to know that the blog comes from a place of personal contemplation and spiritual growth. The aphorisms were my attempt at conveying information in a symbolic manner, and the style is one that is being seen less and less these days. They give a direct view into the core of my psyche at the time of writing, which makes them the most personal post by far and is also why I present them without comment.  The final piece of this spiritual trilogy is a misunderstood one, and one of those that were I to edit now I would change quite a bit to make a few things more clear, but for the record is a deeply theistic piece.  These three represent the cornerstone of the blog and its ethos.

The Shifting Paradigms of Alternate Reality Gaming (2010)

Another one of my favourite posts, mainly because of the paranoid noir-like world that it portrays. Alternate reality gaming is something that seemed poised to take off in a big way, and although to a certain extent it has simmered down recently I still think it’s an entertainment medium that has a lot to offer in merging gaming, social activity and the ‘real’ world into a wonderful cocktail that enables personal enjoyment, inspiration and growth. But there were aspects of the scene that were showing some very worrying tendencies, and the ability for this medium to be abused for violent or manipulative ends should not be overlooked.

10 Sectors to Watch for the Next Decade (2009)

7 Random Predictions for the Future (2010)

5 Predictions for the Next 5 Years (2012)

Timeline: The Future of Videogames (2012)

Futurists are supposed to make predictions, it’s part of the genre and it forces us to put our necks on the line.  Here are some prediction posts I’ve made over the last three years. In many ways I think I’m not a terribly imaginative futurist, but these attempts at least show that I’m willing to try! At the very least, if you make enough predictions then some of them are going to be right…

Your Life: The Videogame (2011)

Not everything on Future Conscience has to be so serious and sombre, and so I’m picking this post to highlight one of the more light-hearted explorations of future technology. The gamification of life is a prediction that I stand by strongly, and is also one that I’m quite looking forward to. We’ve only just begun to develop ways to incorporate our technology, our sense of entertainment and our daily lives; and it’s a sector that is going to see rapid growth over the next decade with some completely unexpected results.

Millionize Your Lashes: The Impossible Dream of Cosmetics (2011)

Possibly the post that comes closest to being a pure rant, but this is another one that I’m very pleased with and also feel a certain degree of pride over. The disingenuous world of advertising is an issue that really upsets my sense of autonomy, as it is founded on a notion of manipulation, manufacture of desire and an underlying message that chips away at self-confidence. I’m proud of this post not because of its content, per se, but because it comes up so highly when searching for the product mentioned.

It still makes me chuckle to think that at some point there was likely a marketing meeting at one of the world’s largest cosmetics companies (L’Oreal) with people getting pissed off that this post was ranking so highly on Google searches for their latest product. Don’t fuck with the blogosphere, you agents of the corporatocracy. We bite.

Hack the Planet! Lulzsec, Anonymous and the Call for Accountability (2011)

Anonymous There’s something about the world of hackers, cyberpunks and online activists that is so intriguing that it has always been a topic of great interest to me. Of course the reality rarely matches the myth, but I thought it was important to try and clear up some misconceptions that were going around in the press at the time whilst also highlighting why people of this persuasion – whether you agree with their methods or not – have a very important role to play in the 21st century.

This post doesn’t even cover half the story, as time progressed we learned of hidden arrests and FBI sting operations that only served to make this techno-thriller that much more compelling.

London/UK Riots: Are We Limiting Our Understanding of Violence? (2011)

2011 was when I really began to hit my writing stride, and my response to the London riots written on the day they had concluded is one of my favourite pieces of work. I was shocked to see how quickly many of my previously liberal friends and peers were to call for martial law, swift punishment and harsh sentencing – and so this was my attempt to highlight why we must try and see beyond the surface and rise above our primal response mechanisms. We need to learn how to read the language of our cities and societies more effectively, particularly when they are screaming at us.

Beyond Cute Robots: Towards a New Concept of Sentience (2011)

iCub - Future ConsciencePart of what I love about writing the blog is that it encourages me to get out there and go to exhibitions or other events that are relevant and interesting.  This post sees me playing around with ideas surrounding the anthropomorphic nature of our view of sentience, and I enjoy it because of its philosophical depth. Like many of the posts on the site, it’s basically a stream-of-consciousness piece…which means that it trades off a certain degree of structure and academic riguour in an attempt to access those areas of our minds that rest just on the edge of what we can grasp hold of.

We are the 99%! You are the Revolution! (2011)

The Social Psychology of Occupy (2012)

These two posts bookend my experiences with the Occupy London movement, and in many ways show a transition from pure idealism to the pragmatics of social transformation. The first is a call to action, the second a sincere attempt to examine why the movement all but fell apart.  Broad-based resistance to dominant and damaging social (and, particularly, commercial and economic) paradigms is important, and I hope to see it continue in other forms that can learn from the drawbacks of the Occupy movement and how it operated in practice.  As an aside: if there’s one thing that I will take away from experiences with Occupy, it’s that there is no such thing as a large-scale horizontal movement. No matter how many times you say otherwise.  At least, not yet…

So there you have it…some of the best posts that this blog has to offer. I hope you’ve enjoyed seeing how the blog has developed over the years (some of my earlier writing is so cringe!) and I look forward to writing more for you as we continue to look towards the future and ask ourselves the question: What do we want to be?

Top 10 Futurist Websites

Future Retro (image by Radar Communication, Flickr, CC)

Future Retro (image by Radar Communication, Flickr, CC)That’s right, it’s another top 10 list.  To be fair, we all love them (you know you do…) and they always prove to be popular.  Given that Future Conscience exists slightly outside of the usual futurist circles, I thought that the readers here would appreciate a list of the sites that I often rely on when looking for inspiration about the future trajectory of humanity.

These sites represent my favourites at the time of posting – subject to change, requiring additions…enjoy!

 

10. Southern Poverty Law Center – Intelligence Report

The Southern Poverty Law Center (SPLC) is a ‘non-profit civil rights organization dedicated to fighting hate and bigotry’ and I have long been visiting their site not only because of the great work they do but also because of the publication they produce called the Intelligence Report.  This is a quarterly magazine which is reproduced online that monitors trends in extremism in the U.S and is incredibly well researched and written.  I have a keen interest in groups that foster extreme ideology of any kind, and it is undeniable that in an era of rapid change and social turmoil we must ensure diligence against any group or organisation that promotes an ideology of hatred and destruction.

 

9.  io9

This site is well known to those that tend towards the geekier side of life (i.e. awesome people).  Primarily covering science fiction and comic-related news, the site also has a strong focus on interesting technology and futurist thought.  Basically, from a love of science fiction comes a love of futurist news and its presented in a very accessible and entertaining way.  Bite-sized but with depth, accessible without being asinine, io9 is a great site for anybody with an interest in the future to have as your homepage.

 

8. Antiwar.com

At first you might wonder whether this site could really be called ‘futurist’ at all, it’s almost completely a news site reporting on current events.  However, it is impossible to have any insight into the future without an accurate understanding of the present and Antiwar.com provides one of the best daily overviews of global conflict that you are likely to find.

Of course, it wears its political leanings on its sleeve and I often find some of the comments from readers to tend towards the more conspiratorial side of things – but the news it aggregates comes from across all sources of media and the commentary from some of its columnists is refreshing in the attempt to get beyond partisan political standpoints and delve deeper into the issues at hand.  There’s not much point thinking about the future if you’re ignoring what’s occurring right now, so make sure to put Antiwar.com on your reading list.

 

8b. Future Timeline

Okay, sometimes you miss something from a list that  really does need to be included.  Future Timeline is one such website that I overlooked when first publishing this post yesterday – and since Antiwar.com is not really a futurist website I figured it would be appropriate to rectify this oversight here.  The site feels old-school in its design (like many futurist websites, funnily enough) but contains an almost encyclopedic overview of futurist topics and is one of the few sites to attempt to delineate a timeline of progression.  If nothing else, it gives some perspective to the futurist field and makes you think about where you would place the different advances being discussed.  With a relatively active forum that has built some considerable depth to it over the years, and a good selection of links and regular new updates Future Timeline really does deserve to be on this list –  so here it is.

 

7.  Singularity Institute

Singularity Summit 2011 (image by david.orban, Flickr, CC)Originally focusing on the implementation of artificial intelligence, the Singularity Institute has widened its remit in recent years to include many forms of futurist thought that surround the concept of the ‘intelligence explosion’ or Singularity.  This is where you have Ray Kurzweil (whose site Kurzweilai.net I’m including within this entry on the list) hanging out with Aubrey de Grey, Peter Thiel with Eliezer Yudkowksy – the Singularity Summit is one of the  most discussed events on the futurist calendar each year and for good reason.

Having said this, I’ve always approached it with a slight degree of caution as those attracted to the Singularity Institute do seem to be amongst the more zealous and ideologically alarmist of the futurist community.  Which is not to say that there isn’t concern warranted in the direction that humanity is taking, indeed it is the entire focus of this blog, but amongst all of the very deep and thought-provoking research and position papers there’s an underlying ideological conformity that’s worth noting.  But as far as the futurist ‘rock stars’ are concerned – most of them can be found relating to this Institute in some shape or form, and for that reason alone its a central hub of activity.  Speaking of hubs, I’m going to throw in Singularity Hub into this entry as well – a very good collection of futurist news and links updated daily.

 

6. Science Daily

For obvious reasons, a lot of futurist thought revolves around scientific advancements in technology and medicine; and one of the best sites for announcements and articles from reputable sources is Science Daily.  It’s packed full of content and although the site layout is a bit dense (and also relies on the old ‘hide the Google ads’ technique) there’s enough here to keep you learning for a long time.  It tends towards a pure science focus, and as such there is less exploration of the implications of the advancements being discussed, but that doesn’t stop it from being a great resource to keep on top of the latest scientific advancements from around the world.

 

5. World Future Society

The Futurist magazineThe World Future Society is the preeminent organisation for global futurist thought, and The Futurist magazine gives on a bi-monthly basis the most comprehensive and authentic overview of the field available.  The fact that a large proportion of current-issue content is available online for free is commendable, and although they don’t have the vast free resources of others that will be mentioned below there are for-pay archives available running back through to the 1960s (and at $0.10 an article I think we can call that fair enough).

Beyond the well-known magazine, they hold annual conferences and have an extensive membership network with meetings around the world.  Unfortunately the website itself is falling behind the times a bit in terms of layout and design, and thus I can’t give the WFS the top spot on this list…but as far as futurist organisations are concerned, they certainly deserve it!

 

4.  Institute for Ethics and Emerging Technologies (IEET)

The IEET was amongst the first futurist sites that I really started visiting on a regular basis, and you can see its obvious correlation to the focus of Future Conscience.  The site provides a great news overview that includes multiple posts a day, and papers from their peer-reviewed Journal of Evolution and Technology are available free to download.

The site does suffer like the World Future Society from having a slightly archaic look – but it gets the job done and it gives you the information and inspiration that we crave.  Co-founded by Nick Bostrom, who is the Director of the Oxford Future of Humanity Institute – another organisation well worth your time so I’m going to include them in this entry on the list.

 

3. r/futurology and #future

Reddit FuturologyReddit – the ‘front page of the internet’.  Given the recent eye-opening news about Digg’s spectacular fall from grace, and the not negligable role that the humble narwhal that is Reddit played in that demise, it shouldn’t come as a surprise that one of my top recommendations is a user-controlled news aggregator along with Twitter, everybody’s favourite little microblogger that could.

With just under 11,000 subscribers on r/futurology, there’s a lot of people posting a lot of news, images, thought and generally inspiring things that you will want to see.  Right now on the front page of r/futurology there are night-vision contact lenses, a graph showing the implementation of Moore’s Law, predictions for 2030, transhumanism, space travel, solar energy…the list is endless and changes every few hours.  Beyond the external content, it’s the level of discussion the community generates on an endless diversity of topics that will keep you thinking and deserves such a high place.

Twitter hashtags such as #future (and to a lesser, but more focused extent #futurist) should also be one of your primary sources when it comes to getting an overview of the futurist zeitgeist at any particular moment.  By following the people who post to #future and other similar hashtags you will receive a constant stream of futurist updates on topics you didn’t even know you were interested in.

 

2. RAND Corporation

One of the largest and most influential think tanks in the world, the RAND Corporation is controversial because of its close ties to the US government and armed forces.  Although what their research is used for and by whom should be very carefully considered, the fact remains that the papers that come out of RAND are necessary reading for any potential futurist.  Areas of focus cover all major socio-economic sectors and concerns, and the vast majority of it is filled with useful data, forward looking and projection based.

With over 10,000 research papers available online, papers that inform much of the foreign policy of the world’s largest superpower,  the RAND Corporation influences our general perception of the future more than most people realise.  If you’re looking for data on almost anything relevant to the futurist field, there’s probably a paper on this site that you can refer to.  Whether you should or not, I’ll leave that up to you…

 

1. Wired – Blogs

It’s kind of an obvious choice, but I have to give the top spot to Wired and in particular to their collection of blogs that explore on a daily basis our path towards the future.  If I was pressed to choose, I would immediately say that Threat Level is my favourite blog not only on the Wired site but on the web as a whole.  There are a lot of bloggers out there (and I include myself in this) who are okay at what we do and happy to comment on the world around us, but few have such detailed a grasp and depth of understanding on their chosen topic as the writers over at Wired.

All of their blogs are excellent and each one on its own deserves to be on this list, but Threat Level just picks up on such a fascinating aspect of the modern era (online privacy, crime and security) that I find almost every post there to be a revelation.   The team of writers over at Wired are at the forefront of accessible reporting on often unfathomable cultural paradigm shifts, and their implicit focus on liberty and an overall concern for the collective wellbeing of society can never be applauded enough.

I’ve missed something, but what is it?  Let us all know by leaving a comment below!  And for all you futurist bloggers out there that feel left out, you haven’t been forgotten.  Stay tuned…

Radio Free Albemuth: Interview with Writer/Director John Alan Simon

John Alan Simon - Writer/Director of Radio Free Albemuth

Radio Free Albemuth - Shea WhighamIt’s kind of odd to think that it was two years ago almost to the day that I first got to see a preview screening of the Philip K Dick adaptation Radio Free Albemuth.  That original review has gone on to be the second most viewed post on this blog, something I’m grateful for because it is quite a personal piece in many ways.  The film is a fantastic addition to the legacy of Philip K Dick, and is a must see not only for fans of the author but for anybody who wants a more cerebral and spiritual approach to their film viewing.

So, two years later and the finished edit of the film rolls back into town for the Sci-Fi-London Film Festival – of course I’m going to go and see the finished product!

Before reading my thoughts on this final version – go and read the original review I did for the film.  It displays my appreciation for this work and what it is trying to achieve in a way that I wouldn’t be able to repeat here.  Consider this an addendum to the first review.  You’ve gone and read it now?  Great, let’s continue.

This viewing didn’t have quite the perfectly surreal circumstances surrounding it that last time had, but there was the extra bonus of being able to meet Writer/Director John Alan Simon, and Producer Elizabeth Karr, who were at the screening to answer questions and talk about a project that has been at the forefront of their lives for the last few years.  I’m lucky enough that John Alan Simon also agreed to provide some insight for this site, and after a few thoughts on the final version of the film you can find the resulting interview below.

Radio Free Albemuth - Katheryn WinnickIt’s hard knowing how to review a movie for the second time, but it’s easy to say that I still stand strongly by everything I originally stated – this is not only a film for fans of Philip K Dick, but one that takes very seriously the important message that lies at the core of the work and makes it accessible for any audience.  With a second view, it also gave me a chance to develop an added appreciation for some of its depth.

This is particularly the case for certain character portrayals that I overlooked the first time, such as the subtle and reserved performance from Katheryn Winnick, who plays Rachel Brady.  Her character is marginalised as part of the narrative, and I had done the same when first viewing the movie because I was so caught up in the near perfect portrayal of Philip K Dick himself by Shea Whigham (a performance that rightly deserves a great deal of praise).

Likewise I found a new appreciation for Jonathan Scarfe, who plays main protagonist Nicholas Brady, because with the first viewing I was distracted by the obviously constructed special effects shots that he is often in and overlooked his ability to convey the self-assuredness of a character that others think might be going insane whilst he himself maintains a sense of calm lucidity.  The performances throughout the film sometimes miss the mark, but there’s also a sense of authenticity that’s hard to articulate but comes across clearly on the screen.  This is a deeply honest film, and as such it makes for refreshing viewing amongst the cookie-cutter blockbusters that we’re used to.

Radio Free Albemuth - Shea Whigham and Jonathan ScarfeRadio Free Albemuth is a film that rewards repeat viewings – and not just because this version was more tightly edited and had a more immersive pacing than the preview.  There are levels of detail both in the world, but also emerging from the ideological and spiritual depth of the original text that speak to you differently depending on the person you are at the time.

It is this malleability of how you relate to the film that speaks so highly of its quality and the timelessness of the original source material.  This is a film that will always be relevant, and you will lose yourself in the contemplative flow of its content and form.  It was a labour of love when first written by Philip K Dick – a deeply personal narrative journey – and it has equally been born into the world of film with the same sense of mission and purpose by those who worked on it.  Thankfully, this has paid off with an incredibly deep film that will stand as a perfect tribute to the life and work of Philip K Dick.

I think I already summed up my thoughts best when I wrote the first review, so I’m going to quote myself here to conclude:

You don’t get the masterful cinematography of Blade Runner.  It doesn’t have the flawless characterisation of A Scanner Darkly.  Instead, Radio Free Albemuth provides us with the most faithful film representation we have to date of just who Philip K Dick was as a man, a writer, a mystic.

But enough from me, here’s some insight from Writer/Director John Alan Simon:

1) It’s been two years since the preview of the film in London, and you’ve taken the film around the world since then.  Has any aspect of the film been changed based on the early feedback you were getting?

John Alan Simon - Writer/Director of Radio Free AlbemuthJAS: I think it might have been Francis Coppola who once said – “you never finish a movie, you only abandon it.”   And I’ve discovered there’s a lot of truth to that observation.   Early on, I made the decision that I would rather make a movie that a select number of people really loved – than a film that a larger number of people merely liked.   So I was lucky to have that freedom.

When we screened to Sci-Fi-London in 2010, I knew there was more I wanted to do with the movie but I wasn’t sure precisely what.   The people who I had hoped would love the movie did – in fact – love the movie, including yourself at Future Conscience.   I always knew this was not a film for everyone.  But I also felt in screenings that I attended at various festivals that there was a large part of the audience who should have “liked” the movie more than they did.

I showed the film to quite a few people to help me “diagnose” the problem, including Chris Rouse who won an Academy Award for Bourne Supremacy and multiple BAFTA’s.    He really liked the film but suggested taking a look at just small changes.   Another director friend, Jonathan Heap made a small suggestion about an early scene – ending the scene with a slight trim.   And that change triggered my taking a look at the pacing throughout.   I realized that while each scene was “well-edited” there was a kind of similar tempo to many of the scenes.

So with about 150 small trims, I think I was able to pick up the pace and also create more tension through the rhythm of the scenes.   This also suggested to me to use music a bit  more – so I worked with the composer Ralph Grierson to add about 12 minutes more musical score.   Those changes had the benefit also of cutting the movie’s length by close to 12 minutes.   No one asked me to cut the movie and no one forced any changes, it was all my decision and I think the movie “plays” much better as a result.   By happy chance, the first screening of the final version was the screening that Variety chose to review – and we got a really, really excellent review.

2) As a futurist blogger, I’m interested in what you think are the key messages of the film (and book) when related to society today and looking forwards?

JAS: I think there is an almost “timeless” quality to all truly successful works of literature (and cinema, also).   And just as that applied to Orwell’s 1984 and Huxley’s Brave New World, so, too Radio Free Albemuth.   When I first read the novel, Richard Nixon was no longer president, but there was no war on terror or George Bush, but I still found the book extremely meaningful.  Perhaps at that point, the mystical and spiritual aspects seemed the more important.  As world events changed it seemed like RFA was torn from the headlines, as they say.   Then after Obama,  I was a little concerned about the relevance.  And then the Arab spring – then Occupy movement – now Syria – and perhaps Russia.   The message of the novel – and the the movie – is essentially eternal.  As the character of Silvia says: “it’s an ancient struggle, the value of the individual against the supremacy of the state.

3) Philip K Dick is one of the most adapted authors by Hollywood.  Do you feel the industry respects him as an important part of literary history, or is he seen more as a repository for off-the-wall ideas that make good action flicks?  Does Hollywood get Philip K Dick?

JAS: Hollywood is not monolithic anymore – perhaps it never was.    The studios are run by smart people who have run the numbers.   It makes more sense economically over the long-haul to make a single $100 million movie than a hundred $1 million movies.   So that’s what they do.   And $100 million films have to appeal to a very large number of people or – you have John Carter, right?   And the head of Disney finds himself out of a job a few weeks later.

Philip K. Dick had one of the most inventive minds of the 20th century, in addition to his brilliance as a writer.   So it’s irresistible for Hollywood to “license” those inventive ideas and build large-scale, popular entertainments while jettisoning the humanistic values that really motivated much of Dick’s writing.   And then at a certain point, Philip K. Dick the writer becomes “Philip K. Dick” the brand.   And any chance that adherence to even the bare skeletal structure of a story is gone – hence Next or even Adjustment Bureau.  This is not to knock those films – both were enjoyable on a certain level – merely to state the truth that neither had much at all do with the original works they were ostensibly “based” on.   We ended up using this reductionism to our benefit.   I asked the question, what is the “star” of our movie is the “Philip K  Dick” brand name.   How much can we afford to make the movie for based on that economic assumption, and thereby remain as absolutely faithful as possible to the story and spirit of Radio Free Albemuth.

4) The film is an authentic representation of a very personal work – how did you go about achieving this authenticity (particularly with the character of PKD himself), and how has it been received by his family and others who were close to him?

Radio Free Albemuth - Shea Whigham and Hanna HallJAS: I like actors and, having worked in theatre some, I enjoy the process of working with actors.  Not all film directors do.   But I will agree with most directors that “casting” is the most important element for getting a great film performance.   If you cast the wrong actor it’s very hard for even an enormously skilled director to “recover” from that error.   There simply isn’t enough time while making a film.   So I like to spend a long time casting and to learn from every actor I audition something new about the character and the approach to the dialogue.

I knew that I would probably not cast very well known actors for the leads, because I thought it would likely take the audience out of this strange,quirky alternative world to see Brad Pitt or Mark Wahlberg in the lead parts.   Not that we ever approached them!   Or would have had any chance to get them.  (By the way  If Brad Pitt HAD decided to make this movie, it would have become an entirely different movie – in terms of budget, effects, everything.  That’s like what happens if the Queen or President of the U.S. accepts an invitation for a “small dinner” at your house!).

So I feel very fortunate to have been able to find the right actors for these parts.  I try to focus very hard on three or four qualities that I want each character to embody.  Qualities are so basic usually that it’s not a question of acting – but more of “being.”   On stage you can have enough rehearsal time for an actor to “stretch” the boundaries of his own character dynamic but not usually for a film – and especially not such an ambitious film as RFA with a very tight 24 days shooting schedule.

I told Shea Whigham that he didn’t need to “impersonate” Philip K. Dick because unlike Philip Seymour Hoffman’s challenge for Capote, there isn’t much video of PKD out there.   He didn’t have a very distinctive accent.   I gave Shea some documentary footage but also said just to find the “truth” of the character as written in the script.   Although PKD made himself a character in the book, it’s an alternate reality- and therefore, especially in the movie, I felt we didn’t have any obligation to be 100 per cent faithful to the actual man but rather how he thought of himself.   Which is always better than any of us really are.  In reality, PKD had five wives and lots of quarrels in his personal life with friends.  In the book and even more so in the movie, it is a more idealized view of the man as both artist and friend.   So in RFA, the character of PKD is very cool,  almost in the the Beat generation style of Kerouac or Neal Cassady.   So we discussed that – and in trying that approach I think we really succeeded beyond my expectation.

PKD’s daughter Isa Dick-Hackett really liked both the movie and Shea’s performance.   And when we were at the Science Fiction World Con in Reno last year, we were chosen to screen after the Hugo Awards ceremony – one of the sf writers in attendance had known PKD while they were both living in Berkeley.  she said that was a very cool guy at that age in the movie – mid-thirties – and she couldn’t believe how perfectly Shea had captured Philip K. Dick.  So perhaps by ignoring the “facts” we arrived at something close to the real truth.

5) You’re connected to an in-progress adaptation of Flow My Tears, The Policeman Said. Can you give us any updates on this project?  It’s a much larger scale story to adapt, are you excited about this? 

JAS: My producing partner Chip Rosenbloom and I also own the film rights for Flow My Tears.   I have written many many drafts as different actors and directors have come onboard, stayed awhile and left.  Not all that unusual in Hollywood on big budget projects.   Now that RFA is finally going to be making its way into the world,  I can really focus again on Flow.   And, yes, that’s exciting.   It’s a great story – and I’m confident that the right collaborators will find their way onboard.

6) Finally a more general question.  How do you think the art and medium of film will progress over the coming decades?  What are some of your futurist projections for the industry?

JAS: My predictions?   Death of 35 mm film – long live digital.   Bigger and bigger event movies will drive out “smaller films” leaving only the very “smallest”.   For awhile at least.   Than a renaissance of very personal filmmaking that will rival and surpass the seventies as a golden age!   I hope to be around to take part in that!    3D will be accepted as the “norm” just like the introduction of sound and color and so there will be no real “economic benefit” since the audience will simply “expect” most movies in 3D.   Storytellers will figure out how to use 3D in more artistic and subtle ways.

I would like to thank John Alan Simon for taking the time to answer these questions – and more importantly to him, Elizabeth Karr and the rest of the Radio Free Albemuth team for their tireless efforts in bringing this project to completion!

We are the 99%! You are the Revolution!

United for Global Change - October 15th 2011

United for Global Change - October 15th 2011We are the 99%. We are the hands and minds that allow the corporations and institutions of society to function and grow, to produce and profit. Our capability for global decentralised communication allows localised acts to transform the global landscape almost immediately through our ability to shift perspective faster and more effectively than ever before.

Because of this, we have ultimate power over our future existence; but this also means we have a responsibility to act collectively towards a higher mode of being.

The revolution begins now, with you.

Active and vocal resistance such as the Occupy Wall Street movement and its global counterparts must be supported wholeheartedly, but such expression is only one component of the transition that can occur once we hold as sacred our ability to connect and share. An uprising of the 99% is not a call for violent revolution – unless in explicit contexts of violent oppression – but is instead a sign that the global community is beginning to embrace a new way of being. Wherever possible this must manifest through peaceful means that embody the true depth of human communication rather than revert to the easily accessible hatred and anger that our primal instincts might instill within us.

Our focus should be on formulating a collective understanding of the ‘common good’ and how it relates to corporations, governments and communities. Discuss privately and publicly what it means to better these areas; how one can identify and encourage such behaviour; what alternatives or options might exist and how they might allow us to grow and evolve into the multitude of different contexts and forms that transform society.

As a society we have to better understand the difference between desire and need, to recognise when we have enough of a personal share and it is time to distribute of ourselves to others in greater need. Our demand is that we renew society around a central proposition of fairness and equality, arrived at through transparent representation, rather than remain with the status quo that often serves only the needs of a self-perpetuating elite.

We must not dismiss the true hardship of life that countless face, barely finding the capacity to eke out a meagre existence within the current order. Nor should we ever allow ourselves to forget that almost half the planet lives on the equivalent of $2 a day, experiencing difficulties that many of us cannot even fathom. But we must recognise that to make demands of an amorphous and unaccountable ‘They’ will not bring about the revolutionary change that is needed in the very fabric of society in order to ensure a fair and just future for all. Injustices should always be fought against within specific contexts and towards particular guilty parties; but the wider movement overall must focus on proactive progression towards equality and liberty that transcends national borders and uplifts the exploited rather than focuses too narrowly on tearing down the impenetrable.

We cannot progress on opposition alone, for we must also provide the solution and become an active participant in its manifestation. The momentum being gained through the current physical expression of discontent must be harnessed and utilised to bring about a positive change in the many and varied structures of global society. You are the revolution!

In order to see progress we have to start acting upon our grievances, for it is only through action that we can improve our understanding of goodness and life; of justice and peace. Embrace openness, and always maintain the peaceful composure of genuine fraternity whilst not holding back from standing up to those who attempt to break down the bonds of society. The 1% are not to be identified through a bank account balance, but rather those working actively against the common good, looting the global community in order to ensure dominance, and rejecting transparency in instances where openness will benefit a large proportion of society.

Where are the practical suggestions behind these words of idealism? Even whilst reading this you are already imagining them, picturing them each to your own context and capacity. You already know what to do, or at the very least how to make a start. Particular actions can’t be dictated to you, because the reality is that a truly revolutionary movement must find its birth in all of us. By doing so it manifests across all social strata and circumstance and builds strength through the bridges formed between different local situations. Transformative power emerges from the unique perspectives of all those who participate. The one thing you must do now is start participating with open sincerity and pure intention.

The popular occupation movement cannot in and of itself lead to the change demanded, but what it does very successfully is galvanise those who hear its message from the influence of a deeply corrupted system. A system that promotes narcissism over compassion and thrives on our capacity to feel powerless and apathetic amongst the distractions and noise of modern life. Stand in peaceful unity when you see such a movement emerge in your locality, but know that you do not do this just to represent your own particular beliefs and values; you do this to change the world for the better of all that wish to see humanity flourish in its diversity.

No matter what community you identify with, you have a sense of what it means to belong and an empathy that can extend its membership beyond the immediate and increase your networks. Always seek to widen your capacity to give and receive. Be emboldened by the magnificence of life and the miraculous nature of creative endeavour.

It is important that we overcome the disgraces of the modern world with a joy that signifies our hope in the inherent goodness of humanity. An uprising of this nature means nothing if we will merely fall back onto the old tropes of xenophobic tribalism and selfish endeavour. True activism requires one to shift the entire momentum of their life and to shift it in such a way that maximises positive impact in whatever context we find ourselves in.

Do not reject authority outright, do not fall into the trap of blind anti-authoritarianism that often serves to weaken the possibility of representation and participation. Strive for ownership of government, not rejection of it. Recognise that government exists in a wider sense than just the halls of parliament, and that we are all guardians of a just and honest society. Radicalism for its own sake runs the risk of serving up change without true form, of revolution without recreation. It also runs the risk of playing into the very hands of those who seek to oppress this movement by undermining the deeper and wider message of participation that it represents.

It is vital to keep a strong basis of peaceful solidarity and not be goaded into actions that undermine the core message. Aggression must sometimes be used against particular injustices in order to overcome their influence, however true systematic change cannot be predicated on hostility but must rather be built upon foundations of charity. To stand together arm in arm, literally and figuratively, is to create a unified solidarity that will embolden those who come into contact with it. It will allow and encourage them to make the changes in their lives that are required on an individual level, across millions and millions of people, in order to make a lasting difference.

This is why, if nothing else, it is your duty to identify that you are part of the 99% and that you do so not just because you are angry but because you are hopeful. There is no fixed political message, no ideology or dogma other than an acceptance that the way forwards is to be built upon equality, openness and mutual understanding. Be very wary of those who would seek to undermine this message with calls for violence based upon hatred, for they are either seriously misguided or attempting to provoke you away from productive action.

The moment to physically stand up and be heard is right now, but what must come afterwards requires a concerted effort to move the message beyond the picket lines and into the heart of our collective being. It’s about recognising how to actualise the capacity for charity and compassion that the wisest throughout history have promoted as the peak of human endeavour.

We must continue to be vigilant against injustice, but at the same time also accept some responsibility for allowing such grievances to occur in the first place.  We must stand in solidarity alongside the vulnerable and exploited around the world, but at the same time recognise that standing alone is not the only action needed. Once we have accepted this responsibility we can make a solemn commitment to no longer be culpable either through action or inaction. This will be the watershed moment that brings about a true revolution and recreation of society.

We are the 99% and there is no need to expect us because we are already here. Those who make decisions and act contrary to the tenets of goodness, justice and equality are not afraid of resistance; they are afraid that we might realise that they can be ignored and sow the seeds of a new form of social existence. Now is not the time to tear down the 1%. Now is the time to make them irrelevant.

For more information see United for Global Change – 15th October 2011 and Occupy Together

Why We Should Not Worship God

Water Lily (image by Powi, Flickr, CC)

Water Lily (image by Powi, Flickr, CC)The debate between atheism and theism in the public sphere has for all intents and purposes ceased to be; replaced instead by two sides very devoted and committed to highlighting the grave errors that the other side makes just through the act of existing.  What could be a very useful dialogue has instead turned into simple tribalism with little evolution of argument.

Theism needs to produce a more articulate response to the atheist critique (particularly when it comes to the political manifestations of religion), and atheism needs to move beyond the rhetoric of spoilt intellectualism if it is to be taken seriously as a social movement.  There are plenty of theologians and philosophers having high level discussions behind the closed doors of academic publishing houses; but in the public sphere the discussion seems to have become fixated on one question alone: does God exist?

Unfortunately for both sides of the argument (unfortunately, that is, if they wish to ‘win’ the debate), this question is not only unanswerable but inherently meaningless within the context of human spirituality.  Any endeavour for higher purpose and a virtuous life has no need to be predicated on answering this question – acts of goodness, compassion and love are worth doing simply because they have been defined as good, compassionate, or loving.  To label something with these categories is to state that one should try and engage with it, to embrace its existence, to seek to bring it to action.

These things are desirable whether or not there is a God – and thus the objective, rational existence of God becomes inherently meaningless when it comes to our understanding of the good in humanity and our practice of it through spirituality or moral philosophy.  My personal belief in a deity does not directly inform my aspiration to be a better and more socially uplifting individual, nor would the proven nonexistence of a supreme being stop me from wanting to explore wholeheartedly the spiritual component of my life.  Both sides of the debate are too focused on proving right their ideological position, ignoring the inspiring possibility of mutual action and endeavour that could result from moving beyond this dichotomy.

The only other philosophical option is one of nihilism, to seek to dismantle all forms of morality or concepts of ‘good’ and replace them instead with an extreme relativism that allows the murderer to stand next to the healer on equal footing; that removes any form of social contract that informs our sense of ethical behaviour; that embraces liberal individualism to the point of even undermining the concepts of freedom and liberty.  Down this path lies only a surrealist impossibility, a theoretical experiment that ultimately exists with words alone.

It takes only the slightest shift in perspective to undermine the pessimism of nihilism.  Instead of looking at the subjective, localised creation of meaning and seeing only a hollow shell, we can see the awe-inspiring beauty of existence tied into the creative process itself.  If meaning is not objective it only serves to make it more miraculous, because to create meaning is to actively participate in what humanity has come to label divine.  We have the ability to manifest God (to the atheist, the part of the experience of consciousness that we label God), and it is an ability that is not dependent on the objectivity of initial existence.

Which is exactly why we should not worship God.  The greatest response to the atheist critique is to accept the failings of systematic worship; a human construct that is usually a slave to political motivations and often based on a deference of responsibility that enables us to segregate sacred from profane and limit the true role of the divine impulse in the human condition.  This role is not to defer ourselves to the point of abstraction, but to embrace the autonomy implicit in our consciousness and dedicate it to the service of goodness, of virtuous action and movement towards an ever-adapting construction of love, joy and happiness.  An understanding that does not call for the abolition of ‘church’ or other communal spaces of spirituality or religion, but does demand that they evolve towards providing a more open and conducive environment for manifestation.

Collectively as a species we have evolved towards one purpose: Creation.  The universe has systematically developed towards a state in which the creative force grows exponentially, and we are at the forefront of this evolution towards limitless creativity.  There is no need to worship God (especially if one believes in God), and there is even less need to debate over God’s existence for we already know that we can participate in creation.  Atheist and theist alike stand on equal footing when it comes to this creative potential, and it just requires us to overcome the shadow of nihilism (which emerges out of linguistics) and embrace creation founded upon a collective and constantly evolving understanding of goodness, compassion and love.

The only aspect of the worship of God that we must retain is a sense of humility, of gratitude for the creative capability we have inherited and continue to grow into as a species.  We can stop worshipping God (which is not the same as removing belief in God), as long as we continue to move towards a state of being that promotes goodness and has a place for all within its boundaries.  Boundaries based not on answering questions of belief or unbelief; but of collectively determining what constitutes the good and having done so committing ourselves to actualising it.  Churches, universities and every similar playground of philosophical and spiritual creation are appropriate places for this formation to occur and disseminate out to wider society where it can continuously be re-evaluated and evolve.

We must formulate a dynamic response to the human condition that recognises the creative foundation of the cosmos and our role in it.  We do not need to debate on the existence of God; rather we should be focused on establishing a context for Good that incorporates the fluidity of our ability to Create.

Discussion: Can WikiLeaks Be Shut Down?

WikiLeaks Logo“Now, ultimately, this issue isn’t just about information freedom; it is about what kind of world we want and what kind of world we will inhabit.  It’s about whether we live on a planet with one internet, one global community, and a common body of knowledge that benefits and unites us all, or a fragmented planet in which access to information and opportunity is dependent on where you live and the whims of censors.” – Hillary Clinton, 21st January 2010.

My how times have changed, eh Ms. Clinton?

I doubt that there is anybody reading this blog that isn’t already aware of the WikiLeaks juggernaut that continues to gain steam both in the press and in the reaction from various governments around the world.  With each passing day we are being provided with more information showing all of us just how government bodies work, and perhaps unsurprisingly the amount of underhanded activity that takes place.

What is also becoming more clear with each passing day is just how much effort is being placed into bringing the site down.

Emerging over the past week is a clearly co-ordinated attempt to remove WikiLeaks from the internet, and even to end its existence as an organisation.  So, what I wanted to do with the discussion this time is look at whether or not WikiLeaks can actually be shut down – and what this very serious precedent might set for the future of internet neutrality.

I don’t want to get too bogged down in discussions of whether or not the ‘scandal’ surrounding WikiLeaks is deserved.  There are many naysayers (as there always are with any kind of large game-changing event of this nature) that will happily dismiss the leak of 250,000 cables as irrelevant and uninteresting.  To be honest, I don’t particularly even want to take part in such a discussion.  Except to make two statements:

1) WikiLeaks is currently being used as a test-case for just how much ideological freedom the internet possesses and how easily that freedom can or cannot be circumvented.

2) It is kind of disheartening to see just how jaded some people have become in regards to true betrayals of trust perpetrated by those who are supposed to represent the common good.

With that said, let’s survey the recent week in the fascinating struggle to keep us all from viewing WikiLeaks and its recent release:

A massive Distributed Denial of Service (DDoS) attack takes place from an unknown source (often linked to a Lone Wolf operator known as th3j35t3r - ’The Jester’).  This amounts to essentially flooding the servers that WikiLeaks resides upon with a massive amount of data requests in order to clog to internet pipelines (estimated at up to 10Gb/sec); forcing the site to become unavailable for various periods of time.  Despite DDoS attacks clearly being illegal under various jurisdictions such as the UK and Sweden (unlike WikiLeaks), no attempt is made to condemn or discover the source of the attacks.

Calls from various right-wing fronts of the US Government to remove WikiLeaks from accessing any kind of internet services – most notably from Senator Joe Lieberman and Sarah Palin.

WikiLeaks moves to the Amazon cloud service in order to scale up according to how strong the DDoS attacks are coming in.  Amazon soon after drops WikiLeaks, citing a breach in its Terms of Service as reason.

everyDNS.com drops WikiLeaks from its Domain Name Server service, thereby removing the ability for people to access the site through a normal web address (i.e. http://www.wikileaks.org).  The site can still be accessed directly through one of its IP addresses, and a few days later it moves its DNS capabilities to Switzerland.

The French servers that were hosting some of the leaked material mysteriously go offline, coinciding quite neatly with calls from people within the French government to remove any assistance for the organisation.  The material is quickly brought back online via The Pirate Party in Sweden, and subsequently a French court declines to force the permanent removal from French servers.

PayPal freezes the WikiLeaks donation account, taking hostage an amount of roughly US$60,000.  The banking arm of the Swiss postal service, Postfinance, quickly follows suit by cancelling Assange’s account – which has since prompted a DDoS backlash in its own right.  In a seemingly unrelated postal incident – the Melbourne based post-office box for WikiLeaks will face closure (the number 4080 will never be the same again).

Mastercard and Visa both remove their support for their customers who wish to make donations to the various WikiLeaks funds – citing again Terms of Service breaches and ongoing investigations into the legality of the organisation.  It should be noted that Mastercard at least still enables people to donate to white supremacy causes such as the Ku Klux Klan.  Facebook and Twitter won’t join the lynch mob until true evidence of law-breaking is proven – showing that innocent until proven guilty can thankfully still apply.

Julian Assange gives himself up to authorities following an Interpol request for his custody via Sweden for unrelated allegations of sexual misconduct.  He is quickly arrested and a few hours later brought to court in which he is refused bail and is currently being held in a remand prison in the UK.

The US government has outright stated that it is trying to find a way to charge Assange through its Espionage Act; Senator Joe Lieberman also goes on record stating that the New York Times should also be investigated for reporting on the leaks.  A press conference with Barack Obama goes by without a single question being asked about the affair…

So, that’s most of the story so far; and we can be assured that there is yet still much to come in this struggle to keep WikiLeaks available to those who wish to view the material they have published.  What is interesting to watch is just how desperate many powerful people are to see the site be taken offline, and even more interestingly just how futile their attempts are proving to be.

Can WikiLeaks be shut down for good?  All things point to this never being able to occur.  Firstly, the site and its content has already been mirrored over 1,000 times; covering pretty much every jurisdiction on the planet.  A number of news outlets hold in their possession the complete files and can release findings at their leisure (and the Guardian newspaper from the UK should be commended for its stellar and continued coverage); and there’s also the fact that a few hundred thousand people have downloaded the archive in encrypted (and therefore inaccessible) form via bit.torrent.  All of this is even before we begin discussing other whistleblowing websites that have existed for many years, and new ones that are preparing to launch as all of this takes place.

To top it all off, an encrypted insurance file allegedly containing numerous more leaks and sensitive material of an unknown nature has been disseminated amongst tens of thousands of people in the case that anything might occur to Julian Assange (such as an unfortunate ‘accident’) or WikiLeaks as a whole.  All that is required is an encryption key to be released and I fear the world’s media outlets might implode with information overload!

WikiLeaks, at least when it comes to the totality of the material they have in their possession as of this moment, is not going anywhere – ever.  The people behind it are technically savvy enough to have ensured they remain one step ahead of those trying to silence them.  Whether or not they will be able to continue to release future leaks of this magnitude (such as the alleged leaks covering a major US bank) is yet to be seen.  However, undoubtedly somebody will else will just step in or the organisation will change form.

Overall, this is actually a wonderful testament to the true power of internet neutrality and the ability for information to remain available no matter who wants to censor it.  What we have here is the first test case for global freedom of information – truly what we are seeing here is the power of the people over government in its full glory.

Now, I’d like to go on record and state that I’m definitely not advocating that the internet should just be some kind of Wild West (an appropriately cynical historical analogy if ever there was one) where any kind of activity, criminal or not, is allowed free reign.  But clearly there is an issue of public accountability and transparency at hand here – the information being fought over is already changing the global stage in immeasurable ways, and there is more than enough support for it around the world to put forward a very solid case that it should not be allowed to be censored (if democracy is what we really want here).

What it really comes down to is that it has yet to be established that WikiLeaks have broken any laws – and therefore the constant and sustained harassment and persecution of the organisation should be viewed very dimly indeed by people concerned with human liberty and a global freedom of speech.

Apparently, Hillary Clinton and the US Government subscribed to such a world-view less than a year ago…

Since this is a discussion, I’m going to leave further comment until we hear from some of you.  So, what do you think?  Can WikiLeaks be shut down for good?  If so, should it be shut down?  What does this mean for the future of the internet?  For the integrity of investigative journalism?  For the future of freedom of speech?  Can the US still host World Press Freedom Day in 2011 with a straight face?  I look forward to your responses.