Tag: neurology | Future Conscience

Tag Archives: neurology

[Review] Brains: The Mind as Matter – Wellcome Collection exhibition

Posted on June 16, 2012 - 1 Comment

The Wellcome Collection in London have curated some fantastic exhibitions over the years that grapple with the human condition in a way that is accessible whilst still maintaining a great deal of depth and vision. Brains: The Mind as Matter continues the trend and explores ‘what humans have done to brains in the name of medical intervention, scientific enquiry, cultural meaning and technological change’. Not much belongs on Future Conscience more than that, so let’s get into the review.

To begin with, it’s important to recognise that as a free exhibition such endeavours should only ever be commended as the public service that they are – providing enquiring minds with educational outlets that teach, provoke and inspire. It’s the last weekend of the exhibition, and when we visited in the morning it wasn’t too crowded; but I walked by a few hours later and there was a queue around the block to get in. The way in which people were drawn into this exhibition, and the level of engagement that you could see in the people walking around was testament to our fascinating relationship with the subject matter.

Things start getting very meta when you consider that such a configuration consists of the visitor’s brain examining the physical objectification of brains and how they were/are understood within different historical and social frameworks formulated within the brains of the people conducting the work whilst distorted by our individual perceptions of what we are viewing and reading, a strange juxtaposition of the different states of mind that exist throughout time whilst the physical organ itself remains the same – sitting there in a jar gleefully mocking the audience of thousands in some kind of hall-of-mirrors endless recursion into ourselves. Sorry. I won’t do that again.

3D holographic representation of a brain scan

What the exhibition mostly consisted of were numerous tools, drawings, models and videos that highlighted our attempts to understand something so complex and yet so central to our experience of being that you end up in a wonderfully recursive loop of enquiry that whilst progressing through time also can never really catch up to the sheer natural beauty of the organ itself. Given that this blog focuses extensively on technology, I was also interested in the changing ways that we have tried to examine and manipulate the brain through technological means.

The exhibition showcased everything from macabre looking cranial screw kits (trephines, new word for the day), head calipers for measuring and categorising people according to skull size, a copper coil MRI ‘jedi’ helmet for children, electroconvulsive therapy machines, containers for storing cryogenically frozen brains, through to holographic imagery systems and micron-thick brain slicing/scanning devices. The exhibition didn’t cover (at least not that I saw) the many issues now being discussed in the futurist field about our ability to technologically or artificially reproduce the function of the brain – although this veers more into ‘mind’ territory than the physical brain itself which was the theme of the exhibition.

There was an oddly quaint approach to cases of ‘disturbing imagery’ that smacked of a world of political correctness gone mad. Upon walking into the exhibition there was an usher standing at the door whose sole job it was to hand you a little flyer warning you of the possible emotional turmoil you might face at looking at icky things. On top of this were numerous warnings as you make your way in, then you get to the ‘disturbing’ videos themselves and they are placed behind these strange little viewing windows which require you to actively attempt to view them rather than risk the possibility of being disturbed by an accidental viewing (see the image, I’m not sure whether this is a new trend in exhibition design but I’ve never seen something quite so protective).

The exhibition itself also seemed to be lacking some narrative cohesion, and the way in which the various elements were split into different categories (measuring/classifying, mapping/modelling, cutting/treating etc.) meant that it regressed into the more traditional collection of objects with small amounts of interpretative text alongside each rather than building a more contemplative approach to the subject matter that could have been much more directly thought-provoking. There was a good mix of different approaches to the object of the brain, from the artistic to the scientific with a dose of cultural in there when it came to the subject of donating or experimenting upon the brain. There was just something about the exhibition design which left it all feeling less cohesive then it could have been, although once again the Wellcome Collection must be commended for the quality and breadth of the objects on display.

I came away from the exhibition fascinated by the acceleration in our approach to understanding and interacting with our crown organ. The exponential curve of technology that is well understood within the futurist community was here on stark display, and yet amongst it all we didn’t seem to be much closer to breaking through the elusive boundary that separates physical enquiry and objective classification from the experience of consciousness and its capacity for infinite incarnations. The exhibition removed itself from this discussion by focusing on the physicality of the brain, and yet it existed as a spectre running throughout everything – something displayed quite strongly in the artistic pieces and even the vintage film posters. The inquisitive nature of the brain trying to objectively grasp itself is a wonderfully paradoxical aspect of the human condition that matches the depths of theological and philosophical paradox, themselves an inextricably linked component of the whole process.

Objective and subjective, physical and metaphysical, scientific and artistic, division and unity; all of these working around one another in a more dynamic and fluid form then we are able to appreciate when examining life through individual lenses that are themselves at every moment acting out the miracle of the micro within the macro. It’s hard not to find yourself going down such contemplative paths when literally confronted with the physicality of the organ that allows us to think and be. For this alone the latest exhibition from the Wellcome Collection is a resounding success, another feather in their very illustrious cap. I look forward to seeing what they bring us next.

A quick note of appreciation (or possibly apology) for the photos taken of the exhibition displayed here. If anybody from the Wellcome Collection is reading this, I did buy a copy of your exhibition book as compensation for my clandestine photography. It’s a great book, and I suggest others who didn’t get a chance to visit pick it up as well.

Filed Under: Reviews, Science & Environment

Can you compete with the Super-Taskers?

Posted on April 15, 2010 - 4 Comments

We’ve all heard about the importance of multi-tasking, particularly in the modern technology driven world that many of us now live in. There’s even a big fuss going on now about how the new iPhone update will have multi-tasking capabilities – which is remarkably not that big a deal, really.

In our daily existence as sentient beings, multi-tasking really does set us apart from many other species; and is also a large factor for success when competing with other people in our information rich world.

But I would suggest that we haven’t seen anything yet. Think you’re pretty good at multi-tasking? Well, get ready for the Super-Taskers and their uncanny ability to have more things going on at once then you could ever possible handle; even on a good day.

This idea came to mind when watching my younger brother (16) and his friends just hanging out on a lazy weekend afternoon. For most of us, the extent of our multi-tasking on such a day consists of holding a drink in one hand whilst we change channels on the TV with the other – maybe every now and then mixing this up with a few words of conversation if someone else is in the room. Of course, this would be us on a lazy Sunday; why would we exert ourselves too much, that’s what work is for right? This is when I head over to see what the gang are up to: and predictably enough there they are playing a co-op game on Xbox 360. Sounds normal enough; but wait, there’s more.

Each of them had on a 360 headset as they were playing a team game and not only needed to communicate with each other, but also with team mates not physically present. In front of all three of them was an open laptop (two Macs and a PC), and on those laptops each of them had Facebook open, each of them had YouTube running and buffering different funny videos to show one another, two of them also had Skype going whilst the other was playing World of Warcraft. When I came in the room and asked my brother how they were going, I got a detailed response – adding another component to the matrix of attention-demanding focus points in the room. Consider this scene for a moment. Visualise it.

Now ask yourself – when was the last time you did such a thing? For the majority of you, the answer is going to be ‘never’. For many of you even, the answer will be ‘why would I?’, and herein lies the question at hand. In 5 – 10 years do you think you will be able to compete against a hard-wired ability to multi-task (Super-Task…) to this degree? Because that is when the social media generation will be entering the job market in droves, all of them capable of juggling more plates then you can fit in your dishwasher.

But of course, I hear many of you say, we can learn to do such things. In fact, many of us now do exactly that – particularly so with the types of people who would be reading a blog such as Future Conscience. In response, I would ask you to think about how you compare to most of your friends in this regard; and if you’re anything like me you will see that you are already on the top-end of multi-tasking capability when it comes to your respective peer groups. It might sound like a rather hollow prediction, but I’m absolutely sure that society’s capability to multi-task will increase quite dramatically over the next decade or so. The question is, are we able to keep up?

You see, for teenagers such as my brother there is nothing but multi-tasking. These are people who can barely remember a time without Facebook, let alone mobile phones. Webcams, headsets and instant messaging are as normal as opening your mouth to speak to someone in the room with you – and quite often the conversation crosses all four mediums within a single interaction. The amazing thing is that none of the tasks seem to suffer as a result.

Take the game being played in the example given here: they all knew the exact moments they could momentarily distract themselves from the TV screen to type multiple messages in two or three different chat windows, or press play on a newly buffered YouTube video. Regardless of the physical dexterity needed to do this, consider the mental ninjutsu required to follow all of these disparate strands of information simultaneously.

All of us are capable of such things – the human brain is truly a miraculous thing – but it is only the younger generations who have been doing this for as long as they can remember. For them, it is an inherent ability that comes as naturally as walking and I believe that this process will only accelerate as time moves on. Within a decade there will literally be people who cannot remember a life before Super-Tasking. Who have been hard-wired to exist in such a world, and to whom such interactions are as common as Facebook status updates.

Personally, I’m looking forward to seeing the effect this will have on society. It’s possible that such division of focus leads to short attention spans, or less of an ability to focus solely on one unique thing. However, I think it is more likely that our brains are adapting at an incredibly fast rate to the exponential influx of new information sources now available to us. With all of these new information streams to learn from and adapt to, the ability to multi-task is truly one of the most important skills to master; and those who can master it to the point of becoming a Super-Tasker will excel beyond what many can currently fathom.

[ad name=”Google Adsense-Medium Square”]

There are those who are quite negative about this new rush of information. They hate Facebook and think it is anti-social; belie Twitter for its inanity; mock videogame players for their lack of ‘real’ activities. But the shift is coming, and I really don’t think it’s just going to be another fad. Ignore it all you want, but unfortunately such action doesn’t make things disappear – it just means that you are no longer relevant to the conversation at hand. With that in mind, do you think you’ll be able to compete with the Super-Taskers?

Filed Under: Communications & Technology, Lifestyle & Society