Discussion: Does social media negatively impact spirituality?

Rose and Lily (image by CresySusy, Flickr, CC)I wanted to try a slightly different angle with this post and create a call-out for discussion surrounding a particular topic. Before I begin however, I think it’s important to highlight the wonderful work that continues to be done by WikiLeaks (yes, their servers are down at the moment due to incredibly high levels of traffic) in providing a space for whistleblowers to find a voice.

The recent publication of over 90,000 documents pertaining to the war in Afghanistan needs to be commended as many times as possible. Obviously digesting all of this material can be quite a daunting prospect, so I would direct you to the analysis done by the New York Times as one of the best mainstream media examinations of the leak.

With that important announcement dealt with, let’s get onto the question at hand: does social media negatively impact spirituality?

Let me get the initial response that we all have out of the way – ‘It depends how you use it. It’s only a tool.‘  I agree with this sentiment entirely, but for the sake of promoting discussion let’s forget about that point for a moment and presume it a given. What I wanted to look into, specifically, is whether social media in its various forms (and most particularly manifestations such as Facebook, Twitter and LinkedIn that rely on individual digital identities) helps to promote aspects of our being that tend to have a negative impact on spiritual progression. Even more specifically – does social media feed our egos beyond all else?

Now, I’m expecting a number of you to bring up different ideas around just what spiritual progression, and spirituality, actually means – and I’d really like to promote such a response as it’s obviously one half of the question being raised here.  For me, a large component of spiritual progression revolves around the dissolution of individual ego and striving to seek success purely for personal gain.

Alfons Mucha - 1896 - SalammbôAs one progresses spiritually, there seems to be an almost universal tendency to see that progress as being done for the greater good of all rather than merely the individual. You are no longer seeking enlightenment (or however it is phrased) for personal glory or gain; you are doing so in order to play your role in the uplifting reintegration of the entire universe. A feat that, ultimately, means that you as an individual ceases to have any relevance; or even existence.

From this perspective, we can still come to either conclusion in regards to social media. In some regards, it enables us to better empathise with those within our network – understanding to a far greater degree the intricacies that their lives involve and therefore being exposed to some of the many different and varied ways of expressing the human condition.

If we enter into it with the right frame of mind, these tools can certainly provide us with a small glimpse into a form of consciousness that is wider than merely our own. The peer group becomes a microcosmic expression of the macrocosmic collective consciousness, and we might in some small way learn to immerse ourselves within it.

On the other hand, there is almost no better set of tools for the negative influence that our ego is capable of than those provided by social media. Here we have an exponentially increased ability to portray ourselves as kings of our own universes – mavericks, femme fatales, social influencers, political powerhouses, erudite authors and every other form of social category that might be desirable/hip/independent/better-than-you.

In fact, what I have tended to observe is that those who are more spiritually aware (notice I don’t use the word ‘progressed’) tend to also be those who use social media in an ego-aggrandising manner…and before you start, yes I myself am guilty of this crime and am not just passing judgement from my tower of perfected serenity. Observing this behaviour in myself is actually what led me to start seeing it in others in my social media networks, and once you start really looking for it it’s amazing just what you will see. In moments of intense spiritual focus, it can actually be quite a depressing and even terrifying experience.

estupid ego (image by !unite, Flickr, CC)I wrote a post related to this exploration, entitled ‘Crafting a Digital Identity‘, which was when I first started becoming self-aware of this tendency within my own behaviour and began to see it clearly in others as well. From what I can gather reading around the subject, I don’t think it’s something that is purely a coincidence formed out of the rag-tag group of peers that I seem to have assembled online.

The individually inflated ego is one of the true identifiers of the human condition and one that will always latch onto any available tool and outlet in order to enhance its influence. Social media quite often, ironically, leads us to become more inward looking and self-obsessed.

So, if spiritual progression finds much of its utility from the productive dissolution of this egotistical behaviour than surely social media must be seen as a highly negative and spiritually destructive influence at its worst; and at the very least a dangerous set of tools that we must be ever vigilant of if we hope to use them positively.

So what do you think? There are plenty more areas I could cover with this, but I wanted to leave them for the time being to see whether or not this experiment in creating a topic discussion here on Future Conscience might be fruitful. So please do comment, and at length if you feel up to it. I’m very interested to see where you might take this…

Is social media a negative influence on our spirituality? Or do the connections and information we gain allow us to rise above the less savoury aspects and overall find great value? What are the pros, what are the cons?  If we become a social media driven society, which at this point in time looks like quite a likely conclusion, then what impact will that have on our ability to be humble…to connect with things greater than ourselves and our own forged image?

Or is this post just another example of somebody waxing-lyrical and posting it on Facebook in order to appear ‘deep’?

Corporate Ethics: To better the world, we must better ourselves

Aristotle by RaphaelIt’s a real cliché these days – ethics.  Ever since the financial crisis, businesses and top-level management have been throwing around the word (and others such as values, integrity, sustainability) like rice at a wedding.  As part of my ‘real’ job, I often attend lectures and symposiums discussing these ideas and how they can relate to multi-national corporations; banks and hedge funds; start-ups and small businesses.  ‘Corporate Ethics’ is the catchphrase on everyone’s lips at the moment.

All of a sudden, everybody’s got a conscience.

Part of this is because they have been forced to develop one.  Through scathing media attacks on bankers’ bonuses and ethically questionable dealings; to simple, practical little things such as losing billions of dollars – businesses of all sizes suddenly forgot about the Gordon Geckos and became much more about the ‘common good’.  It is being sold at these lectures and conferences as a way to improve the success of your business and help lift us all out of the quagmire, particularly in these difficult times when consumer and public opinion is so fragile and centrally influential.

Managers at all levels are being asked to instil ‘from the top down’ corporate values and ethics; assessments should contain an examination of how well employees are meeting a specific Code of Conduct; corporations should consider investing more openly and publicly in philanthropic programmes.  All of these things, and many more, are being touted as the answer to all of our current problems.

To the less sceptical, all of this can only be a good thing.  We’re moving in the right direction if Directors and CEOs are considering such things, surely?  In many ways, I guess that is correct.  It’s better that terms such as ‘values’ and ‘ethics’ are bandied around with real worth attached to them than the alternative ghost-town of social conscience that led us directly into this mess.

I’m not so cynical as to presume that these discussions are not being taken seriously, or that they won’t lead to some very real improvements to the way we conduct business and the impact that the global economy has on all of our lives (and, let us not forget, the planet we exist upon).

But is this approach going to be the most effective one, the one that allows us to evolve most quickly in the direction that we need to develop in?  In other words, how much truth is there behind the sentiment – how deep does the feeling of compassion really go?

One thing that has struck me throughout many of these lectures and discussions is that the language is always couched in a manner that removes personal responsibility from the equation.  The talks are not about ‘my ethics’ – they are about ‘corporate ethics’.  The language used continues to build up the corporation as an entity in its own right, one that can have its own internal values and compassion without need to resort to external sources.  And yet, all corporations are made up of individuals – all actions and movements made in a businesses’ name are conducted by people.

Crowd protesting G20 meeting in LondonIt sounds obvious, and indeed it is, but the global economy is made up of individual people.  Each transaction has a reality behind it that exists well beyond the numbers on paper, well beyond the bottom line for an amorphous group of ‘shareholders’.  Corporate ethics means individual ethics – or at least that’s what we should be talking about.

Not corporate improvements; social improvements; or regulation improvements – but individual improvements.  This is the foundation that we should be building upon.  The whole might be greater than the sum of its parts, but its entire basis is dependent on the nature of those parts.  Ethical conduct exists within those parts, within us.  Not in some ethereal entity (the corporation) that only exists in our minds, but in those entities (us) who make the decisions and manifest each action.  To better the corporation/society/government, we must better ourselves.

Perhaps a practical example might bring me a bit out of the lofty clouds of idealism.  Last night I went to a lecture conducted by the head of one of the largest corporations in the world – talking specifically about ethical values in business.  There were a number of panel members responding to the initial lecture and one of them, another head of a large multi-national, proclaimed proudly that this year – for the first time – his company would be specifically assessing how closely individual employees met the corporate Code of Conduct.  The room as a whole seemed to think it was a great idea, and a wonderful way to build ethics into the fabric of any corporate structure (judging by the number of nodding heads).  I wasn’t so impressed.

To me, the whole idea takes us down a path that removes personal accountability (ironically) – replacing responsibility of action instead onto ‘the Code’.  If it’s alright by the Code, it must be proper and ethical.  Keep in mind that, for the most part, these codes are not of the spiritual variety – these aren’t ‘love thy neighbour’ aphorisms.  These codes are often made up of statements such as ‘strictly adhere to Intellectual Property rights’ or ‘be transparent and honest in reporting your financial figures’.  These are corporate Codes of Conduct, after-all.

One could easily adhere to such a code and still make decisions that are fundamentally damaging to a large number of people in our wider, global society.  You could pass with flying colours your assessment, and yet still have sold out a large portion of agricultural land, that services many thousands of people, to be demolished in the search for precious gems (possibly a trite example, but one that has and does occur in kind nonetheless).

Let me finish by clarifying a point I made earlier.  I’m not saying that the increased, and seemingly sustained, focus on ethical and moral matters within the corporate sector is not encouraging or beneficial.  It’s surely better than nothing at all.  I’m also certainly not saying that corporations shouldn’t have Codes of Conduct, or that financial regulators shouldn’t exist.  What I am trying to say is that we must question whether such actions alone are the most efficient and effective way to bring about the change that we desire.  Some also even need to ask whether they truly desire such change, or are merely paying lip-service to it in the hope of later circumventing any rules or regulations put into place.

For if it truly is change that we want.  Change on a global economic level.  Then we must focus on the individual – we must make a call for each of us to progress ideologically (and, for many, spiritually) so that when the time comes to make decisions with ethical consequences we have the best tool for the job: a true and developed conscience.

We must move away from merely looking externally for corporate ethics; move away from shedding our personal responsibility in favour of blaming group ideology.  Each of us has to make decisions every single day of our lives that have ethical and moral consequences – and each of us can strive to improve how we make those decisions.

We must ask ourselves, each day, what we have done that has had an impact – however small or seemingly insignificant – and whether or not we could have improved upon it. 

When we begin to answer that introspection truthfully, and consciously act upon that answer, is when the corporate world really will begin to change for the better.

The Rabbi & the Golem: A Parable on Synthetic Life

[There was a very exciting announcement recently that synthetic life had been created in a laboratory through the wonderful applications of scientific advancement.  The implications of this are vast and future applications are unimaginable as we truly are about to enter a hyper-accelerated period of scientific and technological advancement.  Amidst all of this, however, is a perspective that I believe should not be forgotten.  So, rather than my usual commentary on the ethics of this situation, I thought I would try something different and provide a spiritual parable about synthetic life.  The message of this story was inspired by a qabalistic joke of sorts, told to me almost a decade ago by a Rabbi who was teaching me about Jewish mysticism.   I hope that you enjoy it.]

In the far reaches of the kingdom, there existed a lonely figure; an isolated Rabbi who had devoted his life to discovering the secret meaning behind existence.  He was not always this isolated, but following his lengthy training to be a Rabbi, he found it difficult to live up to the expectations of the community that began to develop around him – so enthused was he by his personal studies into the spiritual basis of the universe.  After a few years of struggling with such a situation, he decided instead to find a place where he could continue his studies without disruption.

Wandering the lands around his hometown, he soon came across a small cave that had been created by men who had long since passed – abandoned and yet still set up with furniture and fixtures to provide one with all the comfort and shelter needed in order to live a simple existence devoted to metaphysical things.

He stopped outside the cave and briefly called out:

“Hello?  Is anybody still in there?  Please do not be alarmed, I am merely looking for a place to be alone with my creator.” There was no response.

The Rabbi decided instantly that it would be the perfect place to focus on his religious life; to devote himself to the study of G-d and the forms of existence that lie behind the veil.  It didn’t take too long at all before he felt himself settled in, his daily routine consisting of inflaming himself with prayer and slowly but surely becoming more and more overwhelmed with the very core of that which our physical existence depended upon.

One day, after a particularly ecstatic morning of prayer and meditation, the Rabbi came across a book that he had never seen before; hidden away behind some of the furniture that was pushed up against the cave wall.  The book was bound in well-worn leather, and made from parchment that seemed so ancient that he worried that upon handling it might suddenly disintegrate in his hands.

Placing it gently upon a soft cloth on the floor, the Rabbi opened it slowly and began to read.  What he found within kept him reading for the rest of the day; the whole evening; and the following morning.

The book told the Rabbi how to create life from simple, inanimate clay.

It took his breath away with excitement, for this was what he had been seeking.  This was the secret of existence that he had been praying fervently to understand – the true knowledge of creation and the creator; of life and living.  What he held in his hands told of the construction of every living thing in the universe, and how humanity could achieve such a feat themselves.  From that moment on, he could think of nothing but learning the secrets within the book and putting them to practice.

Rabbi and GolemAfter many failed attempts and experiments, many long hours learning complicated rituals and procedures so intricate that it was difficult for one man alone to remember them, he finally found success.  Before him stood the rough figure of a man, shaped from the clay that surrounded him, and with the final carving of Hebrew letters upon this statue’s forehead he uttered the incantation that the book required.

The clay figure opened its eyes.  The Rabbi had succeeded – he had created life from inanimate clay!  This newly formed being had not been made from the hands of the Most High, it had been created by man.  The Rabbi felt an immense sense of pride in his accomplishment, a true feeling that he now understood the mysteries of creation.  More than that, with this latest achievement over the very essence of being, he now had control over the universe and could create new forms of life.

The Rabbi knew that now the time was right for him to return to his community, and he brought walking behind him the newly created figure.  The people were astonished – they had never even contemplated that such a thing would be possible – and quickly word of mouth spread and a crowd began to form around the two of them.  The Rabbi beamed with the sense of his achievements and the importance that the community placed on it.

“You see,” the Rabbi said enthusiastically, “we now know the secrets of the universe.  I can teach those of you who are disciplined enough how to do this!  It is all in this book!”  He held the book that gave knowledge over life up in the air, and the crowd cheered loudly.  They whisked the Rabbi and his creation along the streets, a larger and larger crowd building up behind as they travelled.  Before too long, they had reached the town’s central temple –the High Priest standing at the top of its steps, awaiting the arrival of this miraculous sight.

“So you return my good friend!”  The High Priest said with excitement.  It was good to see the friend he had grown up with, had trained with, return back to the community with such triumph.  “Life emerging from nothing but soft clay?!” He continued, “such a thing must be worthy of a visit from Adonai himself!”

“We do not even need Adonai any longer, my friend.”  The Rabbi said, “He will always be our father, our creator.  But we no longer need Him to create life – now we can do it all ourselves!”  At first, the High Priest and the crowd that had gathered around were taken aback by the Rabbi’s words.  But he soon had them agreeing with him, they now knew the secrets of life; and with that had power over the universe and there were so many wonderful applications that they could pursue.

The High Priest said that such an accomplishment would surely not go unrecognised by G-d, and he began to call up with prayer a manifestation of the Most High so that He might acknowledge how far they had come.  Within moments, G-d appeared before the crowd – taking the form of a pillar of smoke placed in front of the temple doors.  At the same time both physical and ephemeral, there and not there.

“My children, you have called for me and I have heard your call.”  A voice emerged from the pillar of smoke, a voice that did not boom as thunder does in the sky; but rather resonated internally within each of the people present.  “I have seen your recent accomplishments, and they please me greatly.”

“We have learnt everything of value that you can teach us now, have we not?”  The Rabbi asked.

“There are still some things you do not know.”  The internal voice responded to all present.

“But I can teach these people the secret of creation; we can now make our own life in any form that pleases us.  Is this not what it means to be the Most High?”

“You have certainly done well in understanding my creation.  I can applaud you for that, and you will learn many wonderful things through this knowledge if used carefully and with great foresight.  But there is still so much you do not understand, for it is not of your nature to understand everything.”

The Rabbi began to become a bit flustered, and quickly spurted out: “Adonai, my creator, I challenge you that I can create a life just as well and as beautiful as you can.  If I can achieve such a thing – will you admit that we are no longer your children but are growing to become your equal?”

“I would enjoy witnessing the fruits of your labour in such a way.”  G-d replied.

With this challenge set in place, the Rabbi quickly removed the mystical lettering from the forehead of the companion he had brought with him; and in doing so it once more became a lifeless, unformed lump of clay.

“We shall create a learned man, one who can speak and answer questions put to it.  Surely this is the hardest amongst your many creations to match?”  With that said, the Rabbi quickly got to work.  Instantly, from within the centre of the pillar of smoke emerged a perfectly formed simulacrum of humankind – made to appear exactly like the High Priest.  This creation of G-d walked over to stand before the High Priest himself and, with very audible and perfect language, asked:

“May I join you in your admiration of this Rabbi and his achievements?”

“Of course, you may.”  The High Priest said with astonishment at being presented with this newly formed version of himself.   The identical figure turned and stood next to the High Priest, watching the Rabbi as he was putting the finishing touches to his own creation.

When the Rabbi’s statue was completed he carved the sacred letters onto its forehead and leaned in closely to whisper the incantation into its ear.  With this breath of life instilled, this second being opened its eyes and walked briskly over to stand next to the first.  With the two now standing side-by-side, and the real High Priest having taken a rather confused step back,  each member of the crowd walked passed and tried to choose which one was the most impressive creation.  They were free to ask of them any questions they wished, or get them to perform movements or activities in order to test their respective capabilities.  In most regards the two creations actually surpassed the capabilities of the original High Priest, much to his personal chagrin.

After a few hours of such scrutiny, all of the votes were in place and the High Priest took care at counting them out before everybody.

“69…70…71…Our Rabbi’s creation has received 72 of the votes, and that from the Most High,” he paused momentarily, “70 votes?!  This is astonishing, please do not be angry with us Adonai – but we are amazed that we are able to surpass you now, to create life which not only resembles perfectly your own creation; but which can surpass it in tests of intellect and fortitude.”

The crowd went silent momentarily, hoping that their G-d would not be angry at this display of pride.  But there came no wrath from above – or plague to repress their spirits – merely a soft breeze that emerged from the pillar of smoke; washing over them and bringing with it a faint hint of light-hearted revelry.

“Why are you laughing Adonai?”  The Rabbi asked, curious at such a response.

“I am laughing, my child, because I knew from the very beginning that you would not be able to win this challenge.”

“But, what do you mean?  I quite clearly have created something that in every way is identical to what you can achieve – so much so that these people cannot tell them apart and chose mine as the better creation – how is there any difference?”

“There is certainly a difference there, my child.  But I shall ask of you: can you see the difference?”

“We certainly cannot, with all respect.  They look identical, sound identical; have the same knowledge and physical capabilities.  Are you to say that because I took slightly longer to produce mine that I lose by default?”

“Not at all, I shall allow you that one.  There is something else, though.  Can any of you see it?”

High priest in robesThe Rabbi, the High Priest and the crowd all stood silently for a few moments; trying to think of a difference but being unable to find one at all.

The moment stretched out longer, a tangible sense of stillness in the air; a few shaking their heads to indicate that there was no difference to be found, some talking quietly amongst themselves but equally unsuccessful.  Suddenly, out of the crowd emerged a girl of very young age; who had gently pushed her way through the towering adults to come to the front.

“I know what the difference is.”  She said in a meek voice, her head bowed down with shyness.

“Ah, my beautiful child, you come before this whole crowd of those who feel above you.  Of those who think that you have so much to learn.  You come before them and show them what they have forgotten.  Bring the child forwards, and let her tell you what you were unable to see all this time.  I can view into her heart of hearts and know that she has the correct answer to share with you.  Maybe I should make her my High Priest right here and now?”

The High Priest, embarrassed by such an admonishment no matter how light-hearted, guided the girl up the steps of the temple and stood her before the crowd.

“Tell them child, tell them what they cannot see.”  G-d said, and with those final words the pillar of smoke began to spiral and dissipate; leaving the crowd to their own devices.   The Rabbi and the High Priest looked up with anticipation at the young girl that stood before them.  The crowd had gone completely silent.

“What is it?  You must tell us, because with this miraculous achievement our knowledge of creation is surely perfect is it not?!”  The Rabbi said with impatience.

“No, it isn’t Rabbi,” the girl responded, “it really isn’t as good as that which was created by Adonai.”

“But why is it not?!  It is the same in every possible way.  Tell us child, what do you see that we cannot?”

With a deep breath inwards, the child lifted her voice so that everyone could hear:

We didn’t use our own clay.

Site of the Week: Big Think

First of all, let me apologise for the small delay in posting – I’ve been rather ill recently and that has reflected in my ability to think too clearly or sit in front of a computer screen for too long! As such, today I wanted to bring back something I did here on Future Conscience for a little while: which is the introduce a new Site of the Week. This week – Big Think.

Read the full article »

Radio Free Albemuth: Into the Mind of Philip K Dick

You could call Philip K Dick one of the main reasons why this blog even exists; not only because he is my most beloved author, but also due to the fact that his thoughts about technology and social progress were so ahead of their time that the level of foreshadowing they present is just remarkable. Tonight I was granted the wonderful opportunity to see a ’sneak preview’ screening of the most recent adaptation of a Philip K Dick novel, Radio Free Albemuth, at the Sci-Fi London film festival.

Read the full article »

The Atheist/Android Conundrum

With today’s post I’m going to explore a common issue in the realm of futurist thought, and one that has been regularly examined in science-fiction literature and film over the past fifty years or so: sentient androids. Are they possible? What would it mean if they were? And how is it going to impact our own sense of identity? More acutely, I’m also going to ask whether or not a belief in metaphysical reality will impact our reaction to such advancement.

Read the full article »

Secular Spirituality: Sacred acts, profane thoughts

With today’s post I want to embark a bit more upon this new direction that I spoke about last week, a direction that was going to be infused with more of a spiritual understanding and voice in an attempt to move away from the purely neutral ‘Wikipedia’ tone that some of my news posts were guilty of. What I’ve picked as a topic to start this new tone is one that has always interested me and is becoming increasingly more important and central to modern life in the developed world: secular spirituality.

Read the full article »

Future Conscience: Taking a slightly different direction

It’s always interesting looking back at work that you have done, trying to gauge whether or not it should be considered successful or worth continuing with. Recently I’ve been going through this process with Future Conscience, wondering just how it will continue into the future and whether or not any changes should be made to the writing style and content.

Read the full article »

Anti-terrorism fatwa to be issued by prominent Muslim leader

Muhammad Tahir ul-Qadri, a prominent Islamic leader is going to issue an incredibly detailed fatwa tomorrow in London that denounces terrorism and suicide bombing in the name of Islam.

Read the full article »