Tag Archives: health

9 Kickstarter Campaigns for Futurists (Open Now!)

Kickstarter BadgeI’ve done another of these round-ups in the past, and Kickstarter is always an interesting place to examine trends in technological innovation.  Popular ideas on the platform, those that hit the zeitgeist whilst seeming effectively viable, really open up to us what the next few years of consumer products have in store.  The grassroots element also brings an extra allure that makes the projects more enticing then just another piece of corporate preview marketing – these designs have grown in the minds of inventors and passionate dreamers.

It’s also interesting to see that Kickstarter has gone through a bit of a lull recently.  With the novelty factor worn off, and a few highly successful campaigns (monetarily speaking) proving to be problematic or delivering disappointing results, coverage of the platform has almost completely faded away.  There’s still so much that crowd-funding can offer, though, and with a bit of patience in waiting for results there are some real gems that you can support at the ground floor and help make a reality.

With that in mind, here are nine great campaigns for futurists (all figures as of time of posting):

SmartPlate – 557 backers on $86,330 with 7 days to go

Tracking nutritional information is massively popular right now, and has been successfully integrated with wearable technology that tracks exercise and fitness activity.  This project is another step in that direction, and gives an early insight into a future where we no longer have to guess about the nutritional value of our meals and can accurately monitor our eating behaviour in order to improve health and physical wellbeing.

Space Coffee Cup – 509 backers on $34,007 with 3 hours to go!

This is a project that looks likely not to hit its target, needing another $16,000 in the home stretch for it to be successfully funded.  It’s not the most exciting campaign on this list, in fact in some ways it’s incredibly mundane.  However, the fact that it is a design combined closely with the needs of astronauts on the International Space Station warrants its inclusion here.  Even if not a successful campaign, it gives us an insight into the kind of small-scale and yet highly complex engineering challenges that bring us one step at a time closer to the so-called future.

Kokoon EEG Headphones – 3,344 backers on $747,728 with 26 days to go

A runaway success, this is one of those projects that is likely to cross a million dollars in backing – receiving at least ten times the amount requested.  A sleek design that combines the current trend for wearable tech and sleep tracking devices with an interesting approach to solving a common issue.   Headphones have always been quite an uncomfortable product, and combining comfort with an intelligent response system has made this a campaign that thousands of people can’t just pass by.  They also promise an 8 month to delivery timeframe which, for those of us who have waited 18 months (or more!) to see the results of buying into Kickstarter campaigns, is a refreshing and welcome change if they can meet it.

Community Cube: The NSA Hates Us – 138 backers on €53,116 with 8 days to go

Community CubeMass untargeted surveillance, internet censorship and commercial data collection are some of the most important and defining ethical problems of the modern era.  It’s great to see so many people within the tech community responding with innovative, citizen-focused products that are attempting to stand up to overreaching governments and multi-national corporations.  By making the difficult world of hardware and software security configuration palatable for proactive and engaged consumers,  products such as Community Cube are helping us envisage a future where we take control of our technology back and don’t need to hand over our privacy and autonomy in return for access to the life-changing world of modern communications.  This campaign represents the great collaborations possible between crowd-funding and a future conscience – and is one that I have personally backed.

Electroloom: 3D Fabric Printer – 421 backers on $85,676 with 26 hours to go

3D-printing is set to revolutionise how we access products and the ability for people to share creativity on an industrial scale.  This campaign represents another step in this transition to new relationships to design – bringing the world of 3D printing to the clothes that we wear every day.  It’s the kind of product that is really for the early adopter crowd – including Star Trek fans – and it’s certainly not a cheap option on this list!  Printable clothes, though, really will change the way many people think about technology and could open up a world of personal customisation and distribution paradigms.

SensorWake: Smell-based Alarm Clock – 1,250 backers €126,399 with 16 days to go

Scent technology is an underdeveloped area with a lot of potential.  This project, like many on this list, is a great combination of cutting edge science with day-to-day consumer products.  Anything that will help us overcome the abrasive experience of early rising is something to be welcomed, and this campaign looks like a great attempt to help us do just that!

LightSail: Solar Sailing Spacecraft – 17,536 backers on $871,844 with 12 days to go

Not all crowd-funding projects are commercial products aimed at consumers, it’s also a way for us to collectively back technological and scientific progress and be part of helping humanity as a whole step into the future.  Combine this collective purpose with a project run by one of the internet’s greatest heroes, Bill Nye, and you have a project that is a really exciting mix of technological innovation, human ingenuity and inspiring exploration.  It’s a fantastic way to get involved and become part of the future of space exploration, and has excellent pledge levels that give you some great keepsakes to remind you of what you helped achieve.

Gloveone: Feel Virtual Reality – 230 backers on $66,506 with 25 days to go

Virtual Reality is on the very cusp of widespread mainstream appeal, and the recent announcements about the Oculus Rift have shown that getting the control mechanisms right is an important component.  There have been a lot of successful crowd-funding campaigns for VR control technology, and this is another one that looks set to unlock an important part of the immersive experience and really help people achieve that elusive sense of presence in virtual worlds.  My own personal experience of the Oculus Rift has been an exciting one (apart from the motion sickness!) and those moments when you feel fully engaged in impossible situations are awe-inspiring and can literally bring you to tears.  Having a sensation of touch and the ability to feel like you are physically interacting with virtual objects will be an important next step in the future of VR technology.

HOLUS: HOLOGRAPHIC DISPLAY – 308 backers on C$217,224 with 26 days to go

HolusAnother runaway success, this campaign really gives us an exciting glimpse into the future.  We know that holographic displays are coming – they’ve been a foundational part of our vision of the future throughout the 20th Century – and seeing sleek and successful designs coming to fruition is inspiring for any futurist.  This is a real glimpse into the near future and, although it’s another relatively expensive option geared mostly towards early adopters, represents the truly great possibilities that crowd-funding is helping us to realise.

So, there you have nine great projects that any futurist might want to consider backing.  Are you going to take the plunge on any of them?  Know of any others that aren’t included on this list?  Let us know by commenting below!

Nanofoods, coming soon to a store near you

Nanotechnology will soon be used in almost every arena

Nanotechnology will soon be used in almost every arena

The big debates about technologically enhanced food usually surround the use of genetic modification, but most of us aren’t as familiar with the concept of nanofood. Which is unfortunate and needs to be quickly rectified, because within the next few years we are about to see a huge boom in its commercial availability on store shelves.

Now, this doesn’t necessarily mean that the food is modified on a molecular level (at least not yet, but they’re working on it!) – but rather that “nanotechnology techniques or tools are used during cultivation, production, processing, or packaging of the food” (definition from Nanoforum).

So what does this mean exactly?  Well, the most practical applications are in changes to the way that food is packaged and distributed.  Nanotechnology can be used in such instances to ensure longer freshness, to change colour when the food inside has gone off, or even to repair broken packaging on the spot.

Agriculturally, the addition of nanosensors into the farming process will allow for far greater information about everything from the nutrient and water levels of soil, to the presence of pests and disease.  Animals can have nanochips implanted that provide vaccines and disease treatments when needed.  Foods can have nanocapsules embedded within them to add additional nutritional value or taste.  There are an almost infinite number of applications for this technology, and in the more distant future we will see products available where we can choose which flavours we wish to experience and which nutrients we need to ingest.

All of this might sound initially like a Utopian food revolution.  However, at the moment the technology is still an unknown quantity when human health and effect is concerned – particularly in the long term.  There are currently few regulations that refer to the use of nanotechnology at any point in the food production and distribution process – and there is a growing call for concern about possible health implications of their use.  Nanotechnology is capable of entering our bodies at a cellular level, and the fact that companies are designing and preparing to implement such products well before adequate testing has been conducted is alarming at best – and surely criminally negligent at worst.

[ad name=”Google Adsense-PostSquare”]

Considering the consumer backlash against GM foods, particularly in Western countries, it is difficult to see how nanotechnology that impacts the food substances themselves will catch on in the short term.  However, I can easily see that people will readily accept nanotechnology utilised in food packaging – which may in the end prove to be a very beneficial technology that helps solve the problem of the vast amounts of food wasted daily.  The point being however, that we really should take the time to assess these products and not rush them to market in order to beat competitors and make money.

There is another issue at hand here, and that is do we really need to adapt our daily foods with such technologies at all?  Whereas nanotechnology could lead to some fantastic benefits in other fields such as engineering or medicine, is there truly a need for us to incorporate them into our supermarkets?  We should rather consider adapting our consumer habits to help combat issues such as food wastage and long distance product sourcing.  Is there a point where such progress no longer becomes progress, but rather a search for greater novelty or profit?  Do we really need to fulfill our Willy Wonka fantasies of three-meal-chewing-gum?

I can understand some arguments surrounding the use of nanotechnology in agriculture, particularly in areas where such use could lead to relief from starvation and poverty – but even then, we are unaware of any long-term environmental impacts that might occur.  The results of which could possibly be devastating for the local communities.  Not to mention the problems associated with having corporate ownership of third-world farming techniques, which is an ethical minefield that we have seen present around GM foods.

Time and time again it seems that the greatest ethical concerns surrounding technology come from the corporate need to boost profit-margins.  Shortcuts are taken to get products to market, and sometimes warning signs are ignored.  There needs to be far tighter and specific regulation created now in regards to the use of nanotechnology, and at the very least we need to ensure that as consumers we must be informed as to when and where nanotechnology is utilised within our food or, for that matter, anywhere else.  We must be given an open and clear choice, rather than having such products forced upon us unknowingly.

We will certainly be following nanotechnology in all of its uses closely here at Future Conscience, as it is a rapidly growing field the implications of which must be more openly explored.  Let us know what you think about nanofood technology – good or bad?

[ad name=”Google Adsense-Link Banner x4″]