Category Archives: Science & Environment

Site of the Week: Big Think

Big Think screenshotFirst of all, let me apologise for the small delay in posting – I’ve been rather ill recently and that has reflected in my ability to think too clearly or sit in front of a computer screen for too long! As such, today I wanted to bring back something I did here on Future Conscience for a little while: which is to introduce a new Site of the Week. This week – Big Think.

Big Think is the kind of website that has only really been able to exist recently – being as dependent on high quality video streaming as it is. As such, it’s a kind of interesting hybrid between the traditional TV interview format and the evolution of blogging into the video-blog arena. What makes the site special, and deserving of our Site of the Week post, is its focus on seeking out true experts and leaders in various fields to impart their knowledge in a frank and revealing manner.

It’s the kind of site that I really can’t say too much more about: other than to say that once you spend some time there you will understand why I hold it in such high regard. Between the countless video interviews, and the many wonderful blogs that are hosted on the site, I can guarantee that you will find something that catches your interest.

The truly wonderful thing about Big Think, is that quite often what grabs your attention will be something that you had no real knowledge of beforehand.  The topics are so varied, and fascinating, that you find yourself exploring new concepts and intellectual spheres that you might otherwise not have come into contact with.  It really is a wonderful educational resource that will widen your intellectual and personal horizons.

There is literally hundreds of hours of interview footage there for you to take in; with speakers ranging from a Jesuit priest to a former editor of High Times and everything in between. Philosophers; film producers; TV personalities; journalists; economists; doctors; scientists and experts of all descriptions can be found imparting their wisdom in a very sleek and minimalist format.

The videos are all of substantial length – many of them running over an hour – and don’t over simplify what can, at times, be some very detailed and complex topics. The interviews are also rather unique, or at least relatively uncommon, in that they leave you just with the expert and the topic.  There is no interviewer muddying the waters with a particular journalistic style.  This format, for me, is part of the great appeal of the site and it’s worth having a look just for that reason alone.

By stripping away any sense of an interviewer/interviewee dynamic you really feel like you are having a conversation with these people. They speak directly to camera – for the most part – and this really immerses you in the topics being discussed. It truly is riveting stuff and I can only say you won’t regret spending some time over at Big Think!

Check it out and then let us know in the comments to this post what your favourite interview/topic was so that others can take a look…for what it’s worth, one of my favourite interviews on the site is with Robert McKee, screen-writing guru, that has some wonderful ideas and anecdotes for anybody aspiring to be a writer.

[Review] Radio Free Albemuth: Into the Mind of Philip K Dick

Philip K DickYou could say that Philip K Dick is one of the main reasons why this blog even exists.  Not only because he is my most beloved author, but also due to the fact that his thoughts about technology and social progress were so ahead of their time that the level of foreshadowing they present is just remarkable. Tonight I was granted the wonderful opportunity to see a ‘sneak preview’ screening of the most recent adaptation of a Philip K Dick novel, Radio Free Albemuth, at the Sci-Fi London film festival.

The original novel was never published during Dick’s life, its material refused by his publishers and eventually incorporated into the book VALIS which discusses many of the same concepts.  The book was PKD’s attempt to make sense of some very strange and revelatory experiences that he had which began in 1974.  The story explores many of his usual themes of totalitarian government and the effects on the everyday citizen, whilst transposing his musings and rationalising of the powerful visions and events that were occurring in his life at the time.

Details of the plot should be left for when you view or read the work, so rest assured that the rest of this review is completely spoiler free.  But before I begin, let me first set the scene for the evening’s viewing – which just like one of Philip K Dick’s books was a miraculous juxtaposition of the normal with a sinister sense of oppression just behind the perfect facade.  It all began as we were heading to the cinema to pick up our tickets for the later screening…

As we were walking our way down the busy streets of London, I could hear the usual sirens of police cars circling their way around the city – not an unusual sound by any means in a metropolis of this size.  Crossing a small side street behind one such squad car, we walked passed a middle aged man with a large backpack on his back; standing against a street pollard as if resting and taking in his surroundings.  At the cinema across the street stood a number of storm troopers and Empire soldiers (this was the Sci-Fi London festival after all), with tourists grouping in front of them to take their picture with such an iconic image of Darth Vader’s evil empire.

Radio Free Albemuth screenJust as we begin to cross, walking in front of this man with his slick backed long hair and bulky backpack, an undercover police officer flashed a badge in his face and took him to one side.  The police car we had just walked passed had stopped right in front of us and an officer jumped out.

My first thought was they were conducting a random stop-and-search, you see such things happening every now and then in London, and we continued across the street figuring that the man would have his bag searched and be let on his way.  Which is when I heard more sirens approaching at a rapid pace.

We turned to see another police car pull up at speed in front of this loitering figure, the plain clothes police officer had at this point grabbed the man’s hands in an attempted arrest.  The man let out a cry for help as uniformed police officers jumped out of the cars to grab his backpack, a number of them converging on him to ensure that he could be handcuffed despite his defiant shouts and struggles.  We watched from across the street, presuming that he must have been a drug dealer or had committed some other crime that warranted such a quick and quite clearly targeted response by the state protection apparatus.

The whole event caused quite a scene right near one of London’s busiest tourist areas, everybody else had stopped in their tracks to watch this display of government control – and I’m sure that, just like I did, they all presumed that the man deserved to be arrested.  In fact, our first thoughts as a group were: ‘we were standing next to that guy when he was approached by the police.  He could have had a bomb in that bag, we’re lucky that he wasn’t a terrorist!‘.

I don’t want to digress too much with this scene, but I hope you will realise just how surreal it is to be picking up tickets for a movie about paranoia of totalitarian government and heavy handed state apparatus – storm troopers in full battle gear on one side of the street – and the real police arresting a man who was violently and very loudly protesting the event.  We knew nothing of the circumstances leading up to this confrontation, but we presume that he must have done something to deserve it.  That the state had protected us from some unforeseen and unknown danger.  We presumed that we were being helped; saved.  With that image in your mind, let me now discuss the latest adaptation of a Philip K Dick novel: Radio Free Albemuth.

Radio Free Albemuth screen 3The showing itself was a test screening as such, complete with feedback forms for us to fill out at the end.  We were told that our views on the film may impact the manner in which it is finally edited, and the chances of it finding wider distribution of one kind or another.  Let me begin then by telling you what I wrote in the final section of the form: ‘Thank you for providing us with such a gift for the legacy of PKD!

Being an independent film, there are the usual quirks that come with having such a low budget to play with.  There are quite a few visionary sequences in the piece that come with the kinds of special effects you often see on a late night sci-fi channel special – reminiscent of mid-90s shows like Quantum Leap and other such efforts.  There are also a few animated dream sequences, both in 2d and 3d, that show the lack of serious Hollywood money for the project.  Added to all of this, some of the performances do play a little wooden at times; again, as you would expect from a film that cannot afford A-list actors to take part.  But don’t think for one second that any of this impacts the film in any large way, far from it.

Because, in the end, it is these things – brought about by the very real restrictions of actually creating a feature length film with relatively little money – that are my only criticism; and they are minor criticisms at that.  The script does an amazing job of transplanting about 90% of the original text almost perfectly.  There were a few omissions (such as the ‘shoe-ad’ sequence) that I would be interested in hearing why they were removed.  But otherwise, there were only one or two points (such as the aversion to alcohol, and some of the conflict between Nick and his wife later in the film) that I could not remember being in the original book but were likely added in order to help the narrative process for those who were not familiar with the work.

Beyond this, it is a perfect adaptation of Radio Free Albemuth.  Absolutely spot on.  When you consider that this book was also Philip K Dick’s attempt to deal with his own experiences in a semi-autobiographical manner this means something a great deal more than it would have were it an adaptation of another of his short stories of which Hollywood seems to love to delve into for ideas.  This is the most accurate representation of Philip K Dick as a man that we have outside of his own words and appearances – it captures his soul perfectly, and faithfully recreates the inner turmoil that this true genius experienced towards the end of his life.

Radio Free Albemuth screen 2For those of you who are not aware, and it’s not a spoiler to say it, Philip K Dick himself is a character in this story – the stone pillar that exists at the centre of the other character’s chaotic whirlwind of emotion and personal upheaval.

It helps tremendously, then, that the role of Philip K Dick is by far the most convincing and magnetic performance on the screen, a truly wonderful piece of acting by Shea Whigham which completely exonerates him from his part in Fast & Furious recently (that’s the film snob in me coming out, I haven’t even seen it).  He captures the tenderness that Philip K Dick was known to display with such authenticity that it is difficult to imagine it done in any other way.  The other actors are at the very least perfectly capable and believable; with Hanna Hall, who plays sultry FAP (Friends of the American People: a Neighbourhood Watch version of the gestapo) agent Vivian Kaplan, another who wonderfully captures the essence of the role she was given.

The film is probably being most publicised because of the involvement of Alanis Morissette as Silvia Saddassa, and she has certainly been appropriately cast and brings soulfulness to the character – although she does give a slightly laboured performance at times.  Her presence in the film, however, does provide an important sense of genuine musical talent which is required and thankfully provided.  Those involved in the production of the film have also done a wonderful job when it comes to location scouting and providing the film with the right sense of slow-paced ominous build up that the book demands in order for the film to be an accurate adaptation.

Which is exactly what you get with Radio Free Albemuth – one of the most truthful and genuine on-screen depictions of the mind of Philip K Dick that has ever been, and, quite likely, ever will be produced.  This film is for the fans, for the legacy of Philip K Dick, but at the same time will hopefully introduce a whole new audience to a genius mind that was well ahead of his time and is even still today under-appreciated.

You don’t get the masterful cinematography of Blade Runner.  It doesn’t have the flawless characterisation of A Scanner Darkly.  Instead, Radio Free Albemuth provides us with the most faithful film representation we have to date of just who Philip K Dick was as a man, a writer, a mystic.

Seeing the surreal muscle-flexing of a society edging ever closer to a police state right before my eyes only served to prove to me completely and utterly that Philip K Dick is a man that needs to be read – and Radio Free Albemuth is as perfect a gift towards helping ensure the immortality of his message and legacy as one could ever ask for. A legacy left for those who need it. For the kids.

Future Conscience: Taking a slightly different direction

It’s always interesting looking back at work that you have done, trying to gauge whether or not it should be considered successful or worth continuing with.  Recently I’ve been going through this process with Future Conscience, wondering just how it will continue into the future and whether or not any changes should be made to the writing style and content.  Readership has been acceptable, albeit not really growing enough for my liking – but one thing that is prompting the thought for change is just a change within myself and my own personal focus on things.

Follow The Heart (image by alicepopkorn, Flickr, CC)Now, for those of you who know me you will realise that I am a deeply spiritual (although not religious) person who has dedicated a lot of my life to the service of Truth and Wisdom.  Future Conscience was a way for me to explore much of this side of me within a secular context, and I think for the most part it has been successful and has certainly taught me a lot about my own views and opinions.

What I originally wanted the site to be, however, was more of a collective conversation – a vision which for numerous reasons never really came to be.  I think there is something about my writing style that does not really promote comments to my posts, although we have gotten some really great ones over recent months, and so I’ve been thinking about how to approach this blog from the view of its strengths.

As such, I’m going to be trying a slightly different angle on things – one that is much more personal in tone and expression.  I’ll be focusing less on recent news and more on commentary and thoughts about the future of humanity.  Less on bringing you information and more on bringing you possibilities.  I hope that regular readers of this site appreciate the change, and it won’t be a drastic change by any means but just a conscious effort to bring more of myself into the conversation.

What this will mean in practice is probably a lot more commentary from a spiritual perspective, something which I fear people will either really love or vehemently hate!  Either way, I feel like it is the right thing to do at this time and am very enthusiastic to explore such things as part of this blog.

Don’t worry, I’m not going to get all Jesus Camp on you – that’s really not my style – and in fact my own personal path takes quite a pan-religious approach to spirituality, seeing all religious expression as different perspectives on universal truths.  What I’m fascinated by is how new and old forms of spirituality will interface with our rapidly growing technological and global society.  There is something very important occurring at the moment in the collective consciousness of the human species, and I’d love to explore that with you.

As usual, any thoughts you may have on this slight shift in voice here on Future Conscience would be much appreciated.  If you feel strongly against it, let me know your reasons – if you’re for it, I’d like to hear why.  Change is always part of the rich tapestry of life, and Future Conscience is an integral part of mine; so I’m hoping you’ll find the change as fascinating as I do whilst experiencing it.

Should homeopathic treatments be state funded?

Homeopathy (image by shellac, Flickr, CC)

Medical science argues that homeopathic products contain no active ingredients and are merely placebos

There’s been renewed controversy in the UK today over whether or not homeopathic treatments should be eligible for funding through the National Health Service (NHS).  As it currently stands, the government does acknowledge that there is no evidence backing the validity of such treatments; however at the same time allowing for them to be paid for through the state-backed NHS system.

The Science and Technology committee, which “exists to ensure that Government policy and decision-making are based upon solid scientific and engineering advice and evidence“, released a statement today saying that homeopathic treatments are not medicines and should no longer be able to be licensed as such nor make medical claims without backing them up with appropriate scientific evidence.

The NHS currently spends about £4 million a year supplying patients with homeopathic treatments for a variety of illnesses and ailments and includes funding for the Royal London Homeopathic Hospital.

The chairman of the committee, Phil Willis MP, stated that: “It sets an unfortunate precedent for the Department of Health to consider that the existence of a community which believes that homeopathy works is ‘evidence’ enough to continue spending public money on it”.

What lies at the core of this argument is whether or not homeopathic treatments should be considered placebos – because if they are as such, as most of the scientific and medical community would argue, then they should fall under a general government policy on how to deal with such treatments rather than have their own exceptions.  Placebo treatments have shown to be very effective in certain circumstances, but ethical problems arise from policies that involve recommending them as they inherently rely upon patient deception which is one of the main reasons why why such policies have not previously been implemented within the NHS system.

The reason why homeopathic treatments were allowed into the NHS system to begin with surrounds the desire to be more accepting of alternative medical treatments and their proponents.  Basically, it seems to come down to the need for political correctness – to never outright tell a group of people that their beliefs are wrong.  It also seems to relate to a desire to place all forms of alternative medicine into the one accepted category whilst also giving them the same level of legitimacy as accepted medical practice.

Now, I’m certainly not one to say that medicine is a perfect science and should be treated as infallible.  In fact, medicine as a discipline wouldn’t ask for such treatment.  But we need to be very clear about where we draw the line between science and other systems of belief.

Science itself has a peer-review method behind it, one that is designed to overcome errors of judgment – and even outright deception – over time.  Homeopathic treatments have not fulfilled the criteria needed, by current definition, to be labelled as part of medical science – so we seriously need to ask ourselves why it is being included under the NHS and whether or not it is appropriate.  Unfortunately, however, to question the role of homeopathic treatments in medical science is often a prelude to a passionate discussion about wide-reaching pharmaceutical conspiracy and totalitarian governments.

I expect this current statement from the Science and Technology committee to renew a lot of debate surrounding these issues, and hopefully there will be ample discussion on the many ethical situations that arise because of them.  I’ll be keeping an eye on any further developments and will let you know what happens.

In the meantime, let us know in the comments what you think about whether or not homeopathic treatments should receive government funding.  Should we see it as old-fashioned hokum?  Or should the right to have all of our belief systems be treated equally (no pun intended) cover all aspects of society without exception?

500 followers! A thank you and an update

Future Conscience on TwitterWell, the Future Conscience Twitter stream has just passed 500 followers today so I wanted to take a moment to say thanks to those who are following us and give you a brief update as to the direction that Future Conscience will be taking over the coming months. For those who say it is easy to get 500 followers in a couple of days, let me just add that we have many more followers than people we are following and almost all of them seem to be relevant and interested in what we are doing. We didn’t game Twitter, so it feels like a real achievement!

Future Conscience was created to try and provide a voice of caution (some might say reason) in an ever-advancing, technological, global society. With such rapid progress also comes the risk of stepping over many ethical boundaries, only realising that they have been crossed long after the event and with little hope of fixing any harm that may have occurred. We need more people to be discussing the ethical implications of human progress in all of its forms, and this blog was created in order to stimulate such discussion.

For those of you who have been reading the posts, you’ll know that it is mostly the work of myself with a few guest posts dotted around the place. I’m hoping in the next few months to have a few more guest posts in the pipeline, and hopefully some of those authors will become a bit more regular and provide another voice to the blog.

I’m also still trying to get a nice balance between this site, some other sites that I contribute to, and my everyday work/life/family – so I’m still trying to figure out just how many times a week I will be posting to the blog. At the moment it’s looking like it will be three updates a week, with a few extras slotted in if there is anything particularly interesting or timely that I come across.  I’m also looking at doing some more feature articles in the near future, including one on the future leisure society, so keep an eye out for those.

Other than that everything will continue as usual. I’ll be trying to update some design elements and functionality when I have the time (any suggestions as to what you may want to see are welcome!). You’ll notice that I’ve added an Amazon widget to the sidebar, and you may see some other links and such in upcoming posts. This is a way for me to help pay for the upkeep of the site whilst also providing you with some honest recommendations. If you feel like supporting Future Conscience, please do check out the recommendations on Amazon – I assure you that everything I point to on the site is done because I highly recommend them.

Most of all – thank you. Thank you for following us, and for those who subscribe to our RSS feed thank you as well! It can often feel like you are talking to an empty void here in the vast noosphere of the internet; and it’s nice to know that at least some people are reading the words being put out there. Any suggestions for what you would like to see in the future are always appreciated, and any aspects you would like to see improved or changed are also welcome. Thanks for reading and listening; it makes all the difference!

Finally, just so you don’t think today’s post is completely self-indulgent, here’s a link to an introductory article about cloud computing and how it will impact us in the very near future for you to read over.  It’s also got some great references at the end of the article which are well worth a look at.  Enjoy!

Nanotechnology Education Act put to U.S. Congress

An interesting news update courtesy of Nanowerk News – House representative David Wu has introduced a Nanotechnology Education Act to US Congress that seeks to encourage U.S. students into the field of nanotechnology research and engineering.  The document begins by recognising that:

(1) The rapidly growing field of nanotechnology is generating scientific and technological breakthroughs that will benefit society by improving the way many things are designed and made.0

(2) Nanotechnology is likely to have a significant, positive impact on the security, economic well-being, and health of Americans as fields related to nanotechnology expand.

(3) In order to maximize the benefits of nanotechnology to individuals in the United States, the United States must maintain world leadership in the field, including nanoscience and microtechnology, in the face of determined competition from other nations.

(4) According to the National Science Foundation, foreign students on temporary visas earned 33 percent of all science and engineering doctorates awarded in the United States in 2007, the last year for which data are available. Foreign students earned 63 percent of the engineering doctorates.

(5) To maintain world leadership in nanotechnology, the United States must make a long-term investment in educating United States students in secondary schools and institutions of higher education, so that the students are able to conduct nanoscience research and develop and commercialize nanotechnology applications.

(6) Preparing United States students for careers in nanotechnology, including nanoscience, requires that the students have access to the necessary scientific tools, including scanning electron microscopes designed for teaching, and requires training to enable teachers and professors to use those tools in the classroom and the laboratory.

You can see the whole document here.  It’s a good sign, and shows an appropriate sense of foresight on behalf of the representative involved in creating the document.  Nanotechnology is an industry that has application in almost every aspect of our modern lives, and there are areas where we can’t even begin to comprehend how much impact nanotechnology will have in the future.

The U.S. will, of course, want to ensure that they are an active and essential part of that industry; and initiatives such as the ones proposed in this document are an important step in making sure that the U.S. does not fall behind in this area.  Interestingly, at the same time that this was being introduced, there were reports of recent research being done at Rice University in Houston, Texas.  The researchers were using nanoparticles to help fight cancer cells.

Say what you will about the incessant push for U.S. dominance in all areas, but there are some real world-changing advancements to be discovered in the field of nanotechnology.  Any extra funding or focus that can be placed onto the industry, both in the form of research but also regulatory standards and guidelines, should be welcomed with great enthusiasm.

There are some important issues to be discussed, to be sure, but the widespread implementation of nanotechnology is going to initiate a true paradigm shift in the way society functions and moves forwards.

What do you think about current research and advancements in nanotechnology?  Are we doing enough to ensure that ethical and safety boundaries are not crossed, even unintentionally?